Tuesday, April 28, 2020

A Tale Of Two New Frame Sets

The new Twin Six Standard Rando v2 in Saffron.
This past week a couple new frames were introduced in steel. That's weird and really awesome. I am happy to have this happening in 2020. Carbon and aluminum stuff comes out all the time. Big whoop! But steel stuff isn't as common, (unless your company is run by QBP), and two steel frame intros in the space of one week? That's crazy.

I thought it might be fun to check these two introductions out and cross-compare the two to see which, if any of them, are in the wheelhouse of what I'd call a 'good gravel bike'.

The first frame under the microscope will be the new Ritchey Outback v2. It is redesigned for adventure and features a new Ritchey Adventure fork in carbon with the requisite 'three-pack' bosses made famous by Salsa Cycles. The frame has the integrated cup head set style and a straight steer tube. The fork features an integrated crown race as well. Through axles front and rear, of course, as well as the now standard flat mount disc brake caliper mounting points on the chain stay and fork leg. The frame holds two water bottles in my size within the front triangle. It has rack and fender mounts as well.

The geometry chart tells us that the Outback has a relatively shallow bottom bracket drop in my size at 68mm. The head angle is a nice 71° though, but the chain stays are long at 453mm. Tire clearances are listed as 650B X 2" and 700c X 48mm. That's pretty generous.

Next up we have the Twin Six Standard Rando v2. This is pretty much a tweak on the first Standard Rando with the major differences being a new through axles and flat mount disc brake caliper mounts. The original Standard Rando also had a straight 1 1/8th head tube/fork steer tube arrangement, but the new one has a 44mm head tube which will accept a tapered steer tube. A more traditional pressed cup head set is also retained. While the Standard Rando features a steel fork, a carbon version, painted to match, is available as an upgrade.

The new Ritchey Outback v2 frame set in "Guac y Crema".
Water bottle capacity has been expanded on the T-6 with three bottle mounts on the internal side of the front triangle, and the appearance of the 'three-pack bosses' again on the steel fork. Plus, the T-6 has an under the down tube water bottle boss set as well. (I don't know that the carbon upgrade fork has those triple bosses, by the way.) UPDATE: It appears from a T-6 Instagram post that the carbon fork does indeed have the three-pack bosses.

The geometry of the Standard Rando has not changed since the first one came out. 72° head tube angle, 75mm bottom bracket drop, and 435mm chain stay lengths here. Tire clearance is 700 X 43mm or 650B X 48mm tires here, so not quite as generous as the Ritchey. However; the T-6 can be ordered with painted-to-match fenders. Rack mounts exist, of course. It also can be set up as a single speed with the appropriate bottom bracket.

Comparison: Tom Ritchey has his ideas of 'what works' based upon his riding style and where he rides. It shows in all the bikes with his name on the downtube. Typically his skinnier tire, off-road going bikes feature high bottom brackets, and the Outback follows suit. The bike strikes me as more of a touring bike, but the lighter gauge tubing would reflect a nicer ride quality than a typical touring bike might have. The integrated head set is okay until it isn't. Of course, you are stuck with the included Ritchey headset as well. Not necessarily a bad thing as long as Ritchey keeps making parts. The fork 'matchy-matches' the head set, so again- you are most likely stuck with that choice as well. Hopefully the carbon lay-up for the fork is forgiving. Gotta hand it to the Outback on tire clearances though.

The T-6 has a LOT lower bottom bracket, a touch steeper head angle, and shorter stays at 435mm vs Ritchey's long 453mm ones. Yes- the T-6 limits your 700c tire size to a 43mm, but that should be okay, as long as it plays out to be that for clearances. The original T-6 Standard Rando also claimed that for clearance, but it really was more like a 40mm limit in reality. If the new one has 43mm with a little room to spare? I'm okay with that.

For an adventure bike to limit you to four water bottles is a bit.....weird. Maybe Tom Ritchey doesn't need much water. (NOTE- I have  since found out, via a comment and some more research, that the Outback has a mount under the down tube, although their spec page doesn't list this fact) I don't know, but the T-6 has room, (in my size) for six bottles of water. I'd need all six on a longer ride in Summer. The Outback could be your bike packing rig/touring bike, and the T-6 would be a much more adept light, longer distance gravel sled. Oh yeah....speaking of sleds. That Outback frame and fork probably is lighter than the Twin Six's frame and steel fork. I had an original T-6 SR, and it was definitely NOT light. If the new one is anything like the old one for tubing, well.....you know what to expect there. 

My old Standard Rando from Twin Six.
So, which one does it for me? Which frame set would be the better Iowa gravel traveler? There is no question in my mind. It is the Standard Rando. The Outback is probably the better 'mountain bike' of the two, but I already have a great drop bar mountain bike in the Fargo. And if you want to know, the Gen I Fargo beats the pants off that Outback in my opinion as well.

Anyway... The T-6 Standard Rando has that all important lower bottom bracket which brings a stable feel in loose gravel. A higher bottom bracket, like my Orange Crush #49 has, (which happens to be about exactly what the Outback's is, by the way), is total sketch on loose gravel down hills. That's why I don't go far afield with the BMC anymore. I'll take the new MCD, or another gravel bike with a lower BB first.

Yes....that lower BB gets you in the weeds with 650B wheels and tires. But I'm okay with that for as little as I'd run the smaller wheels. The old T-6 I had rode smoooooth! I would hope that this newer one would too, and with expanded capabilities in water carrying, it fits my way of riding better as well. The Outback curiously does not provide this option. Another interesting bit is that the fit numbers are almost identical for my size between the two contenders with the exception of stack height where the T-6 is slightly higher. A good thing, probably. I don't know though because the new Salsa Stormchaser is literally slammed and I am getting on with that just fine.

Go figure......

So, the search for the Tamland 2 replacement may end up being the new T-6 Standard Rando in the School Bus Yellow scheme. I know, I know...... They call it Saffron Yellow. Tell me that frame doesn't remind you of a school bus. It's totally school bus yellow. The other color is black. Blecch! Not happening here. Give me the "Don't Hit Me Yellow" over black any day.

Seriously though. This frame, at $700.00 is a steal if it is what I think it is. This may end up being the next test sled at the G-Ted Headquarters. Stay tuned.........


19 comments:

Daniel said...

That Twin Six frame is classy looking and immediately went towards the top of my list of potential frames to get this year.

Guitar Ted said...

@Daniel - Twin Six has always made the Standard Rando a classy looking bike. As far as looks go, I have liked every color scheme they have offered so far. The upside is that the bike rides very well. Good luck on your bicycle frame search!

Ben said...

Is the T6 PF or T47?

Guitar Ted said...

@Ben - Their site does not say, but I saw somewhere that it was T-47. Let's say "unconfirmed T-47". I'll change that in my post. Either way, a solution which is creak free is out there.

Skidmark said...

It looks like Twin-Six offers truly small sizing, not always so for drop-bar adventure bikes.

S.Fuller said...

The specs on the site say "Collared 46mm x 68mm PF30 bottom bracket"

fasteddy said...

Saw the announcement and came here hoping you might have some thoughts on both of these. Always on top of it. Thanks, Mark!

NY Roll said...

@Skidmark, what do you mean drop bar adventure bikes? I ran their TI FSU as a drop bar for the BC Epic 1000, totally great set up.

DT said...

If you have some time (maybe later this year?) you should do an inventory of all the bikes in your stable. It'd be cool to see how everything compares!

Skidmark said...

@NY Roll, I was pointing out that the eff top tube/reach on the smaller sized frames looked good for shorter riders wanting drop bars and more tire size (while maintaining something close to their road bike fit).

Daniel said...

A thing I just realized is the Twin Six frame is a better looking version of Surly's Midnight Special. Granted the MS has a lot more tire clearance but the Rando doesn't have the MS's weird QR/TA axles.

onoffrhodes.com said...

Where do you get only 4 bottles on the Ritchey? two in the main triangle, one on the bottom of the downtube and one on each fork leg....I get 5.

Also in regards to the headset on the Outback...any IS42 headset will work. At universalcycles.com I count at least 10 headsets outside of Ritchey that would work...including Chris King, Cane Creek, BOX, and FSA to name a few.

Guitar Ted said...

@onoffrhodes.com - Because that's what their spec page say- "Bottle mounts: 2" https://us.ritcheylogic.com/us_en/bike/frames/outback-frameset

I checked some reviews and see that this spec is in error. I will add that to my post. Thanks for pointing it out.

And if you wear the integrated crown race out? Again- from Ritchey's spec's (Link the same as above) "1-1/8" straight steerer with integrated 45-degree crown race"

Proprietary part there. Therefore the comment. Unless the race is replaceable, which isn't specified.

onoffrhodes.com said...

@guitarted

In counterpoint to your headset race comment.....in 32 years of riding/racing/adventuring I have never worn out a crown race on a single bike. I have had to replace headset bearings but never actually worn out a crown race. YMMV

Guitar Ted said...

@oneoffrhodes.com - Not my mileage, but I've seen many repairs over the years, and it is not at all uncommon. Just had to replace a Cannondale's headset recently for this reason, as an example.

Boudin said...

I know I’m not the only one that wants to see pictures of that!!

steve said...

GT. I have a 2018 tamland 1, its a good bike. i ride on hilly colorado gravel roads about 90% of the time. climbing is a big part of the rides. in your opinion, is the tamland frame still the bast, compared to the newer steel frames, like the ritchey and the twin six stell frames? also, is it worth while to replace the standard tamland carbon fork with one of ritchey`s all carbon forks? just for the weight reduction? i like the idea of a steel frame with a lot of carbon components for gravel riding. thanks

steve said...

post script...whats the best upgrades fora 2018 tamland 1? i changed the gears to a shimano grx 46/30 crankset, so i can climb easier. i accomplished 14000 ft mount evans but failed on pikes peak, lol!

Guitar Ted said...

@steve - You should have through axles, correct? If so, the other thing to think about here with regard to your fork is offset. Raleigh specified a 50mm offset on Tamlands originally. Shorter offsets are more common. Be sure to check that if you should decide to swap forks. But that said, don't swap for weight savings. That wouldn't be worth the bother on a carbon to carbon swap.

Otherwise the Raleigh Tamland is still a very relevant bike in terms of materials, geometry, and ride quality in 2022. Many companies are now coming to market with bikes saying "We have tire clearances for up to 45mm tires!" or "We have 'Progressive Gravel geometry!", which inevitably ends up being just about exactly like the Tamland. Funny that.....

Upgrades? You said you like the idea of carbon upgrades. Get a lightweight carbon wheel set. You won't regret that. Many are 1G to 1.5G now and have excellent ride characteristics. Carbon seat post with some give is another excellent upgrade. Take a look at the PRO Carbon post with Dyneema fabric. Another good one is Roval's post. A cheaper carbon post that is really good is the Whiskey No. 7

Carbon Whiskey Spano bars are incredibly comfy and light. Those and the previously mentioned upgrades would make a huge difference in how the Tamland rides.

Thanks and Ride On!