Wednesday, July 03, 2024

Review: WTB Vulpine 45, Vulpine S 45, and Resolute 50 Tires

 Note: WTB sent over one set each of the Vulpine S, Vulpine, and Resolute tires for testing and review to Guitar Ted Productions at no cost. I was not paid nor bribed for this review and I will always strive to give my honest thoughts and opinions throughout.

In this post I will give my first impressions of the WTB Vulpine 700 X 45mm, Vulpine S 700 x 45mm, and the Resolute 700 X 50mm tires. The previous post to this one has all the tech specs and first impressions out of the box. Please see that post for those details. 

700 X 50mm Resolute:

First up I have the Resolute. While this tire isn't really a 50mm tire, at least the set I have is not, it doesn't mean that it is not an interesting tire and it is different than the older 42mm version. There is more air volume here, and I was able to leverage that to my advantage by dropping air pressures from my typical, close to 40psi down into the lower 30's psi. This gave the tire a nice, stable feel in loose gravel and the damped feel I expect from a Resolute was there as well. 

When a tire tread design is expanded over a larger casing, this often times means that everything gets 'enlarged'. The knobs, the spaces between knobs, and, of course, the casing, all are bigger on this Resolute than they are on the narrower version of this tire. This does a few things to the wider Reso.

Everything is bigger - The knobs, the spaces between the knobs, and the casing.

First of all, this slows down the tire a bit on hard surfaces like pavement or very hard dirt. But like the narrower Resolute, this tire comes alive on gravel or rougher surfaces where the rolling resistance seems less than it should be. On my roll-down track, the tire did not fare well on the pavement sector but it did a lot better on the gravel sector where I would deem it as "average" for most gravel tires I have tried on my test. 

The Resolute does a great job over loose gravel in the 42mm size and this characteristic is amplified with the wider version. I'd take this tire to places I haven't been before because of its versatility and performance over varied terrain. However; I'd choose something like the Vulpine, or the Vulpine S if I were going to see a lot of hard surface gravel, dirt, or especially sections of pavement. 

So Far... Yeah, so it hasn't come out as wide as I'd been led to believe, but this review isn't over yet. I'll remeasure later and see if I am gaining on that. Until then, I will say I like the wider Reso a lot. It does all the things I have liked about the Resolute tires that came before it, and those are good things. 

700 X 45mm Vulpine

The Vulpine is a tire that doesn't look as smooth riding as it is, and it doesn't seem as grippy as it is either. This version is wider, has more air volume, and again - the knobs are larger.  The 40mm tire, as well as the original 36mm Vulpine, were super-supple feeling and the ride quality was great, they just begged to be a bigger tire, in my opinion. But when I rode the 45mm Vulpine, it was a different beast. 

This tire does have a great grip level in turns, and I would credit the tread design and the softer durometer rubber that the Dual DNA compound has on the shoulders of the tire. It's not an 'extreme lean' tire, but it does have a bit of a "save your bacon" characteristic if things get a bit out of line while you are riding. Especially on a harder surface.

The Vulpine 45mm was also acting very familiar to the 42mm Reso on my roll-down test because it was only 'average' on the paved sector but did a little better than you might expect on the gravel sector of the test. Nothing to write home about here. The ride quality was only average as well. Now, I will say that I believe that not only do these casings stretch, but they "break in" as well, and once you get enough rides in they start to act 'better'. 

So Far... "Better" as in ride quality and rolling resistance. I have the least amount of riding on this tire so I will have to come back to this in my next update, but I don't see anything glaringly negative with the Vulpine 45mm. I expect that this tire will start acting much more like what I found with the Vulpine S. 

Vulpine S 700 X 45mm:

Ah! Now we get to the tire I am most impressed with out of the bunch. The Vulpine S was a surprise when I was presented with this review opportunity, but not surprisingly it follows a current trend in "gravel race" oriented tires which have a smoother center tread area flanked by some sort of minimalist tread blocks. 

I found that the tires were fast, I originally went up to around 38psi on pressure, which was great on pavement, but on gravel the tire wanted to hunt for a line and it was a bit of a chore to get down the road. However; I tried a lowered pressure, closer to 30psi, and the tires came alive. The ride was calmer on gravel, almost totally so, and the damped nature of the casing shown through where before it was just like any other tire. 

Now was that all air pressure, or was it the casing breaking in? I have a hunch it was a bit of both things. I don't believe it was all air pressure, because I only went down around 5 psi, but something got better, and it would make sense that part of the reason why is the casing breaking in. It would also go along with the stretching factor I was told about initially as well. 

On smoother gravel, this tire is amazing. Fast, supple, and just a lot of fun to ride. But even when the gravel gets a little chunky and loose this tire handles it well and the combination of the right air pressure, (whatever that ends up being for you) and the way the 120TPI casing works is a great thing. I fully expect to find a similar thing with the Vulpine 45mm tires, but perhaps at the cost of a little lower rolling resistance.

So Far... The Vulpine S is that racing, go-fast tire that WTB was missing in its range and it is a welcomed addition. When things are smooth, dry, or paved, this tire shines. But even a bit of looser crushed rock is okay if you use air pressure to adjust for that. 

I find it interesting that WTB saw fit to release a 45mm variant of this new tire. It speaks to WTB's awareness of what is happening in gravel events. Not that long ago this tire would have been released as a 38mm, maybe a 40. But with racers realizing the benefits of wider tires and with manufacturers being able to deliver with product that not only is wider, but remains light and is durable? That's amazing to my mind. 

Of course, we'll see how the Vulpine S holds up, but so far? This tire is rising to the top of my "best gravel tires" list very quickly.

Gravel Grinder News: WTB Introduces Three New Gravel Tires

WTB's new gravel tires in their new "Zero-Plastic Packaging".
Note: WTB sent over one set each of the Vulpine S, Vulpine, and Resolute tires for testing and review to Guitar Ted Productions at no cost. I was not paid nor bribed for this review and I will always strive to give my honest thoughts and opinions throughout. 

 Today WTB has announced three new gravel tires to flesh out their wide range of current gravel tires further. Added to the range are a wider Resolute at 700 X 50mm, a wider Vulpine at 700 X 45mm, and a new variant of the Vulpine called the Vulpine S at 700 X 40mm and 700 X 45mm. 

I'll breakdown the tech specs on each tire and in following posts, I will give you my riding impressions on each tire so far. WTB sent out these tires in late May, so I have had plenty of time on them all. 

Vulpine S:

 First, let's get into the new Vulpine S, a race oriented gravel tire. This is a variant on the popular Vulpine gravel tire which has been out for a while now in 700 X 36mm, and 700 X 40mm widths. The Vulpine S has a slick central tread area with those small, rectangular knobs that gradually increase in size and become more squarish off on the shoulders. 

The tire features WTB's Dual DNA compound with a harder rubber down the center and softer rubber in the shoulders of the tread. The casing is 120TPI and features WTB's SG sidewall protection. The TCS tubeless ready casing can be set up tubeless with sealant or with tubes. 

This tire is available in the 700 X 40mm or 45mm widths in either tan wall or black wall casings. 

First Impressions: The Vulpine S tires I received were in the 45mm width. In the messaging from WTB, I was told to expect all the models I was sent to not measure at their stated width until after they had stretched out for a bit. True to form, the Vulpine S when mounted to my 24mm inner width rims came out at slightly under 45mm. However; they now are measuring at 45.4mm/45.8mm. 

My samples weighed in at 561gm/559gm each. This is very competitive for a tire with such a wide casing and for having sidewall protection. This tire retails for $69.95 each.

The Vulpine S seemed to have a rounded profile as well, not the typical WTB slightly flattened crown as with several of their gravel tires. I'll have more on the ride and performance in my follow-up post. 

Resolute 700 X 50:

This tire is the widest Resolute ever offered. The 700 X 42mm Resolute has been a favorite of mine for years and was developed after tire testing by WTB at my old Trans Iowa event a decade ago now. It is the "all-rounder" gravel tire meant for all conditions, wet, dry, hard pack or softer roads. 

The casing is a 120TPI one with the Dual DNA compound. However; this tire has WTB's SG+ casing which has a bead-to-bead puncture protection layer. 

Samples weighed in at 608gm/609gm each, which for a claimed 50mm tire is pretty outstanding. However; this tire has not shown the claimed proclivity for stretching out to size that the other two models I received have shown. The latest measurements I am seeing on this tire are 48.7mm/48.8mm. These are mounted on 24mm internal width rims as well. 

The Resolutes carry a $69.95 price tag for each tire. 

First Impressions: Besides the disappointing width these tires are just like an old friend to my mind. That slightly flat crown of the Resolute 42mm tire is here and that translates to a great, stable ride on loose crushed rock roads. More on the Resolute 50mm tires in my follow-up post. 

Vulpine 700 X 45mm:

When WTB released the second version of the Vulpine tire I was duly impressed, but when I asked about a wider than a 36mm version, I was told it would be awhile. Then there was the 40mm Vulpine. Better, but..... Again, WTB said to wait. Someday that wider Vulpine would be here. Well, now I have it in hand and it is a nice tire! 

Like the Vulpine S, this tire has the SG sidewall protection, a 120TPI casing, and the Dual DNA rubber. The center tread is the traditional Vulpine pattern here though, and that means more grip. 

The Vulpine in the 45mm width weighs a tic more than the Vulpine S and comes in at 571gm/580gm each for my samples. True to form, as with the Vulpine S, these tires did stretch to size and are currently 45.1mm each in width on 25mm internal width rims. 

The Vulpine 700 X 45mm tires are also $69.95 each and come in black wall or skin wall casing. 

First Impression: This tire was highly anticipated by myself and others I know, but my enthusiasm is somewhat dimmed now, only because the Vulpine S is a faster tire than this model and suits my conditions a bit better. That said, this tire is really good and if it weren't for the "S" version, I'd be crazy over this model. Spoiled I am..... 

WTB now uses packaging made from 100% recyclable materials.

 Overall Observations:

WTB has really upped the ante with their new Vulpine S offering and these wider versions of the Vulpine and Reso are great. I will only say that the lack of a true 50mm width on the Reso is a bit disappointing, but maybe my sample is an outlier here. Let's hope so. That 50mm width is a popular size these days and is a width I think will be in demand from riders for quite some time. With newer gravel bikes being designed around such big tires, my hope is that WTB hit the mark with the Resolute and that I just got a set that is odd for some reason. 

Overall, all three models have had excellent air retention characteristics and have been showing no oddities in usage. Installation of all three, on different rims, was typically late-model tubeless. Meaning that I was able to use a floor pump to set them up and things went pretty well. 

As for what I am using for air pressures, I have not gone above 40 psi, and that only to set up the tires. Riding pressures have been at anywhere from just above 30psi to the upper 30's but I have found the lower half of the 30's to be a good place for me. Your mileage will vary there, so take my settings as a guide, not a hard and fast rule for you. 

And I have to mention the packaging, which is plastic-free and 100% recyclable. Kudos WTB! I love that they did this. 

So far, I am in love with the Vulpine S, but you can learn why that is and more about the other tires in my next post following this one.

Delium Tire Introduction

Delium Tire AllRounder and Speed-X Tires.
Review of Delium Tire AllRounder and Speed-X Tires:

Last April news broke at Sea Otter that a new tire company, (well...new in the sense that most people hadn't heard of this company before), was going to offer some new gravel tires. I was asked if I wanted to review some of them, so I agreed and Delium Tire sent over two sets of tires at no cost to me for testing and review. 

The new tires are the Speed-X and the AllRounder. The tires got a first look from me in my Sea Otter post HERE. (Scroll down to the bottom of that post) 

I was hoping that Delium would have the 50mm tires by this time but that is still not the case yet, So, I asked for and received the AllRounder in the 43mm size and the Speed-X in the 40mm size. 

What It Is: Delium is doing a bit of a different take on casing construction. They have what they call a "Dual Zone" construction with the casing having sidewall protection from the beads to about halfway up the side wall. Then a more supple construction from that point over the top of the tire is there which is supposed to lend a bit more compliance, and therefore comfort, to the rider. It is kind of hard to imagine so I grabbed this following graphic from Delium's site to help illustrate this concept.

Image courtesy of Delium Tire

This construction and compound application is the same for both tires I have in for this review. Both tires cost a very reasonable $49.99 each, So, the only differences are the width and the tread patterns here. Let's take a closer look at each tire and I'll give my take on these designs. 

The AllRounder First Impressions:

This is the tire that has some strong "Gravel King" vibes. It features squared off knobs, smaller in size, but which stand proud of the casing enough to provide some grip. The shoulders feature lateral bars which one would assume are there for lateral stability and some cornering grip. 

The 43mm casing width (claimed) is also very much in the ball park for the tire this AllRounder resembles. The design of this tire is familiar looking and if the trend holds true through to riding performance I expect that this tire will do well, albeit that it may be prone to a bit of 'stone flinging', as similarly treaded tires I have tried will do. It seems that the central small, squared off knob pattern tends to grip little stones like fingers and then fling them up into the air as you ride. We will see if the AllRounder follows in this trait. 

Weight: 492gm/495gm

The Speed-X First Impressions:

This tire is very reminiscent of a few tires I have tried which feature very low-tread centers with bigger knobbed shoulders. Tires like WTB's Raddler, or the Maxxis Rambler tires come to mind. This Speed-X is in that ballpark, so I expect a fast roll but good cornering traits and possibly a little more weight due to the heavier side knobs. 

Weight: 502gm/496gm.

The tires will be set up tubeless, of course, and in my next post in this review I will get to how that went and how the first rides went as well. The plan is to set the Speed-X tires up on my Honeman Flyer and the AllRounders on the Standard Rando v2. 

So Far... At a suggested retail of $49.99 each, these tires fall into a category that has not got many competitors, unless you are scoring some great deals on tires, which is a distinct possibility these days. But as for a direct comparison on price, only the American Classic tires come to mind immediately. I tested some American Classic Kimberlite 700 X 40mm tires back in 2022. So, as I compare the two brands, keep in mind that the Kimberlite was a low-treaded, semi-slick tire. 

When I look at weight, the American Classic tires are slightly heavier. Those Kimberlites weighed in at about 506 grams a piece. The big difference could be in width, because the American Classic tires were really 38's, not 40's, at least the pair I tested were never 40mm wide. So, if the Delium tires here can best that by being their claimed width, then we have something to celebrate. 

Then we have ride feel and performance to test out. The Delium tires could prove to be really good, or not. But that is the point here, right? To find out what we have going on with these new tires on the market. But beyond that, we also need to consider whether or not the company is committed to the market. That may seem obvious, but in reality, it isn't. I have tested tires before from companies that produced some enticing models and then pulled out of the US market. Rubino and Hutchinson come to mind. Then there was Vee Tire, who dropped a model of gravel tire and then never really made it available. Same with Tioga. So, will Delium tire join that list? Let's hope not. 

Stay tuned for the next update on this review coming soon, and for breaking news on more tires, which will have dropped here on the blog today after 9:00am CST.

Tuesday, July 02, 2024

Gravel's Beginnings, Culture Past, Present & Future

As part of my 20th year of blogging here I present today this article on the history, culture, and future of "gravel" riding. This was an assignment I took on after meeting Taiki Sakamoto, a journalist from Japan who is an editor at "Bicycle Club" magazine. 

Sakamoto-San asked me to write in brief about the way gravel began here, what the early years were like, and what "gravel culture" was defined as here. He specifically wanted to understand if "gravel" was racing only, or was there more to it than that. He wanted to know if gravel had a non-competitive element. 

I have no idea if Sakamoto-San will use any of what I wrote, but I was honored that he asked me to write this. I thought I would share it with my readers here. So, following is the manuscript of my responses to Sakamoto-San. See what you think.... 

Riders during Trans Iowa v1 April 2005

Gravel's Beginnings: 

 This may be a fool's errand to try to pin down the beginnings of gravel riding as we know it in 2024. In fact, it probably is a foolish thing to try to ascertain. As long as there have been bicycles people were riding them on unpaved surfaces, racing these machines, and mostly having adventures. That is no different than what we witness today. So, let's just agree to say that at some point there was a turn to crushed rock road riding which spurred on a way of cycling that has overtaken the world.

This can be narrowed down to a time when a certain set of unique circumstances in history gelled together to create the "perfect recipe" for what became "Gravel". There is a lot to try to make sense of here, but throughout it all, let's keep in mind that the main thing is that riding bicycles with others - or alone - is a lot of fun.

Now, let us look at the early 2000's in the U.S.A. and what was going on, both culturally and within the realm of off-road cycling. The home computer was still a new thing in those days. People were connecting to sites that catered to special interests which mainstream media was incapable of covering at the time. Specialized information was shared in "chat rooms" online, and the form of social media/communication known as "blogging" was extremely popular at that time.

Within the cycling circles, a decline in participation in road cycling events was evident, mostly due to two factors - costs to produce such events and people's dissatisfaction with the product. Then too, we had an off-road component that was suffering similar issues. Mountain biking venues were hard to get to, being strung across the nation in far-flung locations in many cases. Costs to participate were rising, and many people had no real motivation to undertake what was perceived as an "extreme activity". Especially when it came to the 24hr MTB events, which arguably reached their peak of popularity in the mid-2000's. People were ready for something new.

That new thing ended up becoming "Gravel". After Trans Iowa was announced in November of 2004, my co-founder of the event, Jeff Kerkove, was inundated with requests about the event format and rules. People wanted to know what was going on, and because Jeff, who was at that time a very popular 24hr mountain biking athlete, had a highly trafficked blog, this became the conduit for this new information.

Many ultra-endurance athletes participated in the first T.I., including Steve "Doom" Fassibinder, seen here at the Algona Checkpoint.


A couple of the cyclists that caught wind of this new thing were named Jim Cummings and Joel Dyke. They decided that they wanted to ride on gravel in their home state of Kansas. Joel rode in the first two editions of Trans Iowa and that helped inform what they created. The event known then as the Dirty Kanza 200 became another gravel race which, as you may know now, eventually grew into what is known as Unbound Gravel today.

Between blogs, emails, and word of mouth, gravel cycling started to spread throughout the Mid-West of the United States, an area mostly looked at as being a desolate, unlovely part of the country by many. "Fly-over Country", it was called, because people deemed the West and East coasts of the USA as being more interesting and important. However, as people began to travel to the Mid-West to partake in this new, wild variety of cycling competition, the viewpoint of these participants began to change.

Early gravel events also helped shape what would become known as "the spirit of gravel", which really is a cultural ethos that began as a rejection of what was then deemed to be negative in traditionally formatted, sanctioned racing events. Rules were simple in gravel events, with some simply saying "Don't be a Dick", meaning that if we could all trust one another to follow fair play practices and get along well with each other, we didn't need any other rules.

All types of bicycles were used during the early years of gravel. This scene is from the 2015 Gravel Worlds

Of course, there were rules, but many were simple and with the format being new, promoters and organizers were welcoming one and all. Race fields made up of misfits and rebels, all manner of gender, political leanings, and all types of bicycles were allowed as long as we all got along and shared in the adventures. It wasn't uncommon for race winners to mingle with last place finishers, and even those who did not finish, and share an adult beverage while the telling of each other’s day on the bicycle went on long after the finish.

There was also an element amongst the early practitioners of Gravel which was experimental and pioneering. Keep in mind that while the roads were "Gravel" there was no equipment or clothing specific to Gravel. One had to experiment and discover what worked and what did not work. This also included nutrition and how to deal with the way gravel and dirt roads changed due to road maintenance and weather. 

Mountain, cross, and varying ways to tackle water carrying, etc, were all part of the early gravel scene. This was from the beginning of the 2010 Dirty Kanza 200.
 Just about everything was on the table to experiment with in the early days of gravel. Dual suspension mountain bikes, old 1970's road bikes with 27" X 1 1/4" tires, cyclo- cross bikes, and even traditional road bikes were seen at the early events on gravel. It did not take long, however, for the cyclo-cross bike to become the most popular choice amongst gravel riders. 

 But experimentation continued with issues pertaining to hydration, how to deal with wet, muddy roads, dust, lighting, and more. This "pioneering" phase of gravel brought riders closer together as information was freely exchanged at events and on the various cycling blogs and websites. It was a unique phase in gravel cycling history, and because of the way the knowledge was handled, "Gravel" started to gain a reputation for being inclusive and more down to earth in regard to how riders were treated at events and online. No one was trying to hide secrets, for the most part, and it seemed like the participants were treated more as family members than they were rivals of each other.

You could see this and feel it at the early events whenever we gathered for meetings or after the event was finished up. The term "gravel family" was coined and it seemed that every event was another chance for a "family reunion", which in this country is referring to how related family members often gather yearly from scattered locations to "reunite" and share a meal together. In that sense, the gravel family was a place to belong, and was unlike traditional road and mountain bike events where racers experienced a sort of 'caste system' in terms of groups and interaction with - or between - participants was not fostered by the event promoters. 

The "Moonshine Metric" started and ended in the event host's garage with a potluck dinner after the ride. This scene from 2012.

In fact, this was an important cultural phenomenon in early gravel events. The social gathering was an integral part of the racing experience. Trans Iowa had a pre-event meal where riders spent time getting to know one another. Some events like the Almanzo 100, an early grassroots gravel event in the state of Minnesota put on by Gravel Cycling Hall of Fame inductee, Chris Skogen, invited people to camp in Skogen's back yard the night before the event. Another event I participated in called the Moonshine Metric was held starting at the race director's home and riders were invited to a garage potluck dinner and party after the ride was over.

Gravel Grows Up: 

 Eventually things started to change. One of the most influential changes occurred in 2010 when Jim Cummings and Kristi Mohn decided to bring the Dirty Kanza 200 start and finish to downtown Emporia, Kansas. The event went from being an underground, out of the way event that started at a local motel on the Northwest side of town to a marquee event for not only gravel riders but for the city of Emporia itself.

This focus on the integration of local businesses and city with an elevation of the rider experience at the finish line became a prototype for many other gravel events. Finish line arches, chip timing, professional looking number plates, and announcers were implemented which elevated the appearance of the event and attracted even more people. A similar formula for gravel events has spread across the country and world now since that early move by the DK200.

The Dirty Kanza 200 set the bar for gravel events and challenged the genre to become more professional and polished.
 Another growing up of gravel came when in 2012 Salsa Cycles announced the Warbird model, a gravel racing bike which was the first "gravel specific", mass-marketed bicycle for this niche sport. Subsequently, tires and more gravel specific gear started becoming available. Wilderness Trail Bikes made the first commercially available gravel tubeless tire and HED Wheels started offering a gravel specific wheel early on as well. Suddenly every brand seemed to have a gravel bike and more tires and other gravel related gear started flying off shelves as gravel riding participation numbers skyrocketed in the late twenty-teens.

With larger fields taking part in events and with specific gear now becoming a reality for gravel, the genre started having a tug of war within itself. The days of discovery were passing, older ways of doing events were also going by the wayside, mostly because it was becoming increasingly impossible to have intimate, more familial feeling events with such large numbers of participants. That and the sheer number of gravel events went from a handful of mostly Mid-Western USA events to upwards of 600-700 events by the end of the twenty-teens spread across the continents of North America, Europe, Australia, and elsewhere.

A professional element in terms of the look and feel of events was also met with a professionalism in the event participants, to a small degree. Former World Tour pros started dabbling in gravel, finding a home for their competitive inclinations without the rigors of having to live through a long season of disciplined training and racing. But keep in mind that while the North American cycling media saw this as a positive and focal moment in gravel cycling, it was the continued increase in the average citizen's participation in gravel events, and now just recreational gravel riding, that was spurring on the movement to greater heights.

Professional cyclists started racing gravel events in the 2010's like Allison Tetrick, the winner of the 2018 Gravel Worlds Open Women's field

Current Gravel Culture: 

 The increase of smart-phone usage has been linked to the rise in numbers of distracted individuals driving cars and this has caused much death and injury to cyclists. Not to mention near-misses for people riding paved roadways. The panacea for many was gravel, A place where traffic was slow, lower in numbers of vehicles, and there was the distinct possibility that you might not even see a vehicle.

The capability of gravel bikes also factored in as riders discovered that these bikes - lighter and faster than mountain bikes - could go almost anywhere whereas the road racing derived bicycles were limited to smooth pavement. No longer were these gravel bikes limited to riders racing in the Mid-West, these bicycles were viable the world over, and people took to them in larger and larger numbers.

Subsequently the gravel bike helped to provide ways for groups to enjoy cycling outside of traditional events. Group rides became more commonplace. Impromptu adventures promoted on social media became more common, and communities of "gravel" riders sprang up in locations as far flung as the Philippines and New York City. 

Many group rides and low-key events happen on gravel now which are not related to racing.

Racing has taken on an even higher level of professionalism with the entrance of the Union Cycliste Internatinale and the Gravel World Series. Meanwhile, racing franchises/series like the Belgian Waffle Ride, the Life Time Grand Prix, and events like Unbound Gravel and SBT GRVL have continued to be covered extensively by cycling media and have raised the level of gravel to the casual observer who now has heard about "gravel racing", most likely.

This dichotomy of Gravel, where we have high-level racing which garners all the media's attention, and the grassroots, "DIY" type events and community driven groups now exists and continues to show no signs of reversing its growth anytime in the near future.

The Future of Gravel And Its Culture: 

 The two largest movers of bicycles in the cycling industry in 2024 are the categories of eBikes and gravel bikes. The number of gravel events seems to be increasing as well, so it stands to reason that we should have a continuation of the sort of "gravel culture" we have today. While cycling media will undoubtedly raise awareness of Professional level gravel racing and technology whenever it can, it is also important to remember that this represents a smaller portion of a much larger number of riders who enjoy riding bicycles on unpaved surfaces.

As an example, while it is easy to think that the recently completed 2024 Unbound event was all about Professional racers, keep in mind that there were only 151 "Elite" (pro and semi-Pro) riders in the field of close to 5,000 individuals who rode out of Emporia, Kansas on June 1st. Many of those folks were simply trying to find out if they could stretch their personal limits, finish something that they thought impossible for themselves to do, and perhaps there were several people just out for a great challenge and ride on the bicycle.

In fact, I had one person comment on my blog concerning the event who stated the following: "Great experience overall though, I think we're all going to head back next year. One of things that seemed to work well was it did cater to people like us, just out for fun but meanwhile there was a serious race going on for some. " So, it seems that while the attention is focused on the few Professional athletes, the fun and really, the main body of gravel riders is about having fun and adventure. This is what gave rise to gravel riding, this is what made gravel riding attractive and popular, and as long as that continues onward, gravel will continue to be one of the most popular forms of cycling world-wide. 

Thanks for reading Guitar Ted Productions!

Monday, July 01, 2024

Review: Ortlieb Fuel-Pack & Toptube-Bag - Mid-Term

  Note: Ortleib sent over their Fuel-Pack and Toptube-Bag for test and review at no charge to Guitar Ted Productions. I am not being paid, nor bribed, for this review and I will always strive to give you my honest thoughts and opinions throughout. 

This is the second installment of the Ortlieb bag review. The introduction and first impressions can be seen by clicking HERE

This post will be focused on how the Toptube-Bag fared on a recent ride and how the Fuel-Pack has "evolved" to make it work for my bicycles. First up, the Toptube-Bag.

This bag and its removable feature utilizes a snap-in base with a spring-loaded release. The base is the part that straps to your bike while the matching rail which attaches via the two-bolt hole standard, is attached to the bag. Together they work to provide a rock-solid base for the Toptube-Bag and one that is stable despite the lack of any attaching strap around the head tube/steerer area, which is common for bags like this. 

So, you can load this bag up and it will not rotate around the top tube, nor does it move when you open the magnetically closed top flap. I found the bag easy to get into and it closes with a reassuring 'snap!' when you flip the lid closed. I was also happy to find that a crosswind was unable to flip the top open, which I have had happen on two other bags with magnetic closures. 

The base without the bag mounted on it.

This bag is pretty big. Almost too big for me, and I wonder if it wouldn't be a problem for riders of smaller stature. Many bags that sit on top tubes taper toward the back end of the bike in profile and in width to accommodate dismounting riders, and legs moving alongside when standing and climbing, or accelerating. My legs slightly grazed the sides of the Toptube-Bag when standing and pedaling. I also had several instances where I jumped off the saddle at a stop and I smashed the Toptube-Bag a bit. 

Part of the problem is that due to this design the bag has to sit back from the head tube a bit more than a typical top tube bag would. But besides those issues, the bag works great. It has a cavernous interior which my smartphone could lay flat in. You could probably get a lot of packable rain jackets inside this bag, for instance. It's just a big volume top tube bag.

The Fuel-Pack was just not viable as sent. This was mostly due to how Ortlieb designed the mount, which set the bag, essentially on stand-offs, in a position where it was easy to rotate the bag around the top tube of any bike I put it on. Now - mind you - almost every bike I own has a round cross-section metal top tube. So there is that. 

The bag mounts are supposed to be held on with silicone rubber straps, but these straps are made from a material that is more plastic than rubber and this doesn't help when you are relying upon friction to stabilize the bag. Furthermore, the hooks the straps were to anchor to were pointed upward into the base of the Fuel-Pack making it almost impossible to strap on the bag. I could do it, but it was a lot harder than it should be to get the bag on the bike. 

So, I ditched the straps Ortlieb sent and modified the plastic base pieces a bit. Then I used Velcro strips and laced these through the plastic base pieces. The Velcro strips made it far easier to mount the bag, but the rotation issue was still there. So, I punched a couple holes into the front of the Fuel-Pack with my hole punch pliers I have and laced a Nylon string through the front, went around the stem/steer tube, and tied it on to stabilize the bag. 

That solved that issue, but there still is one more thing about this bag that was rather surprising, honestly, and that was that it would not ever hold its shape, Not when new out of the box, nor will it do so now. It isn't a 'bad' thing necessarily, but contrast this with the Toptube-Bag which stays perfectly rectangular even after I inadvertently smash it while dismounting, and the Fuel-Pack seems a step below that. 

The Next Step: So, now what? The Toptube-Bag is too big, really, but has this fantastic, stable base. The Fuel-Pack is a much better size but has a dismal mounting system that just wasn't going to work on my bikes. Well.....

What about cross-breeding these two bags? Maybe I could use the fact that the two bags use the two-bolt top tube bag mount standard, swap the base from the Toptube-Bag to the Fuel-Pack, and then I could have the bag I really want? 

Stay tuned............