Image courtesy of State Bicycle Co. |
On Tuesday of this past week, State Bicycle Co. announced a version two of their Carbon Monster Fork. The new version features an all-carbon construction with a tapered steer tube. The eye-catcher here is the adjustable drop out to attain two different off sets for the fork.
The off sets are 49mm and 55.5mm. More on this in a minute, but the user can change the offset by flipping a "chip" in the drop out cavity. The fork is compatible with 27.5" tires and 700c tires. Maximum tire size allowable is determined by the offset chosen. So, for the 49mm offset you can go up to 27.5 X 2.3" or 700 X 55mm. In the longer, 55.5mm offset you can go to a 27.5 X 2.45" or 700 X 58mm tire. The Monster Fork also has rack and fender mounts along with the triple boss sets of accessory mounting points on each fork leg. Maximum load is set at 25Kg or 55lbs. Axle to crown is 396 in the short offset and 404mm in the longer offset. The price for the Monster Fork is set at $299.99 USD.
Comments: Now, let's get back to the offset options this fork provides. The marketing copy on State's site gets this wrong, which is a commonly made mistake. I wrote an offset explainer in 2007 for the blog which you can read HERE. That was written concerning 29"ers, but the same principles apply for any wheel size and geometry. The short version is that, all else remaining the same, your shorter off sets are going to bring more stability while your longer offsets bring less stability. Many people feel that a longer offset is more stable, but that is not how bicycle front end geometry works.
The other bit State doesn't point out is that due to the chip being at an angle to the ground when mounted to a bicycle, the flipping of the chip will minutely change your bottom bracket height, head tube angle, handle bar height, seat angle, and all that may be noticeable to some folks. Some may not ever notice it. The changes would be minimal, but it is worth noting that any axle to crown variances, which are called out in the differing axle to crown specs, will change all that other stuff as well.
I love the idea here, of course, being a nerd about geometry. But typically swapping stuff around like offset chips isn't really a big deal to most riders, and additionally, humans are so adept at adapting, (ha!), that most riders probably would feel fine either way you set the fork up after two or three rides. (I know, I've run an experiment concerning this.)
Image courtesy of Fusion Media. |
Six USA Athletes To Compete In eSports Championships in Abu Dhabi:
Coming up on October 26th, the top 20 male and top 20 female eSports riders are convening in Abu Dhabi for the World Championship eSports sanctioned by the UCI.
The event consists of three parts, or "races", in which the contestants will accumulate points based upon finishes. The riders with the most points at the end of the day will be crowned as World Champions.
Six riders, three male and three female, are included from the USA. They are Kristen Kulchinsky, Jacqueline Godbe, Ellexi Snover, Hayden Pucker, Neal Fryett and Zach Nehr.
Comments: Would this even be a thing had it not been for COVID? I wonder about that. Anyway, kudos to any athlete that competed in this format. I cannot stand indoor cycling myself, but "trainer rides to no-where" are a staple of some folks riding. I know, I know....You can do courses, compete against others, yada, yada, yada.... But the fact remains that you are still sitting in the same spot where you began at the end. I'm not down with that.
Not that I haven't tried. I used to own Krietler rollers, I've had various stationary trainers, and I even have a "smart trainer" in the house I've never used. Probably won't ever use it. Maybe I'll donate that to someone.....or the Collective, but in the two and a half plus years I've worked there we cannot give a trainer away and we have several nice ones. Says something there to me....
But I'm not dissing on anyone that gets into this stuff. You do you! I'll cheer you on from outside. Literally!
Image courtesy of Brompton Bicycle USA. |
Brompton Bicycles Offers New Folding Gravel Bike:
News came out this week, and was all over the internet and social channels, concerning Brompton's new "G Line" folding 20" wheeled bicycle. It has an 8 speed Alfine internally geared hub, beefy 20" wheels, and a "revised geomeyrty" for all-road riding. Plus you can stuff the claimed 30+ lbs bike into the back of almost any car or truck for easy transportation to adventures.
The G Line will cost $2,399.00 USD when it becomes available in 2025. There also will be an electrified version of the bike coming as well.
Comments: Okay, neat, I guess. Here's what I know to be true. Smaller diameter wheels are at a disadvantage to larger diameter wheels. It is a physics thing. Alfine hubs are limited in gearing range and require frequent servicing to keep them alive.
Why have an internally geared hub design and a tensioner that hangs down like a derailleur waiting to get ripped off in the next muddy section? This seems to be a disadvantage when internally geared hubs are a great idea partially because they allow the riddance of "dangly bits"
At 30 plus pounds (non-electrified) and at twenty-four hundred bucks? Ahh..... No. Maybe for certain people this opens up possibilities, and for them I am happy. But for most riders, in my opinion, this seems pricey and not very well thought out.
Bicycle Retail Continues To Struggle:
Getting into the last quarter of 2024 now and it seems that bicycle retail is still struggling to find its footing two years post-COVID. There are many reasons why this is happening. Among the many reasons is the anachronistic way bicycle retail is handled in the 21st Century.
I began my journey in bicycle retail and repair in the early 1990's. I can honestly say that not much has changed in the thirty-plus years since then. That doesn't reflect the massive change in riders, buying habits, and desires of riders in 2024 and beyond.
I find, and have found, that certain issues have stymied advancement of bicycle retail and now that alternatives exist, bicycle retail as we have known it may on its way to becoming extinct, leaving nothing in its wake to replace it. At least nothing at scale or worthy of servicing the riders in this country.
Of course, there are some bright spots, but they are few and far between. How will those spots be able to survive without the backing of the industry or without revolutionary changes, I am not sure. Right now the industry has done what it has done for many years, and that is to hook up its wagon to whatever trend can be the horse to pull that wagon, as broken and busted up as it is, lurching forward into the next phase of cycling that takes off. Then the industry will hitch itself to that trend and hope for better days again, like it has for a half a century.
Here's what I see as the deficiencies of bicycle retail in 2024:
- Employee training and retention. With rampant employee turnover, it is impossible to build a knowledgeable, trustworthy employee people will want to lean on.
- Poor Compensation: The industry practically guarantees employee turnover with its poor wages and benefits.
- Focus on Racing: The high-end support of brands on racing in all disciplines is misplaced and takes away from what the largest portion of potential riders needs and wants. Practical bicycle safety in routes and in bicycles for everyday riding is something most brands give lip service to only, and nothing gets done in reality because of this. The response of the average citizen is predictably poor. Shops can only do so much against this and many don't do a thing at all.
I could go on. There is a good perspective on this subject from a former colleague of mine, Arleigh Jenkins, which can be listened to on her YouTube channel HERE.
Image courtesy of Pivot Cycles |
New Pivot Vault Version Now On Offer:
Pivot Cycles announced on Thursday that a new version of their Vault model is now available. The bike has more tire clearance and more capability to carry water and accessories than before while still coming in at a lighter weight than the outgoing version.
The frame features a decoupled seat post/seat tube arrangement which Pivot calls "ISO FLEX", which provides more rider comfort. New also is Pivot's "TOOL SHED", a cable management and storage system allowing riders to stash items inside the frame. There is also cable guides through the frame to prevent rattling over rough surfaces. There are several accessory mounting points and the frame can hold two water bottles on the top of the down tube, one underneath, and one on the seat tube.
The frame is 2X front derailleur capable, has dropper post routing, and the frame is also suspension corrected for 40mm travel gravel suspension forks. The new Vault carbon rigid fork is designed for better compliance as well. Tire clearance is a generous 50mm in 1X mode and 47mm with a 2X crankset.
The geometry is a bit different with sizing running longer top tube measurements than what you might be used to. Pivot advises using a short stem. The bottom bracket is not on the low side, but is pretty decent, striking a good middle ground for current gravel geometry. The head tube angle is on the slacker side with models in their five size range checking in at 70° for a small to 71° for the XL. Sizes in between range accordingly between those two extremes. The chain stay length is a tight 420mm, which is on the short side for gravel.
Prices range from $5,649.00 to $6,149.00 using Pivot's specs for complete bikes.
Comments: This is an interesting bike. Pivot's Vault model was originally a cyclo cross bike but now is a fully MTB influenced gravel bike design. Pivot has infused several interesting features with their water bottle capacity and that short rear end. I like that they thought of a way to introduce some compliance in the seat post area and that they thought about the fork compliance as well. And the price isn't bad compared to many other brand's high-end gravel offerings.
That's all for this week! Thank you for reading Guitar Ted Productions! Get out and ride those bikes!
10 comments:
On the Brompton, the tensioner is necessary to take up the slack when the bike folds. Not ideal but necessary for the way they fold (and to a smaller degree, for the rear suspension). Anyway, folding is the whole deal with Bromptons, and I agree with you that if you don't need folding, there are better options. But if you do, I haven't seen a better one than a Brompton.
I'll be tempted to upgrade from my Brompton M3L when the G Line actually starts shipping. It doesn't seem like a good option for flying but most of the time I'm just bringing a bike along if I have to drive somewhere and the G Line would still work great for that.
I find myself in an odd spot with that Pivot Vault, and many other gravel bikes these days. The trend to wider tires for even the Pros is something I am very excited about. As a larger guy, the bigger tires can be ran at lower pressures giving me a nicer ride all around.
The Pivot can go 700X50.
The Giant Revolt can go 700X53 in the long setting but no UDH for future-proofing.
The Santa Cruz Stigmata can go 700X50
The new Bianchi Arcadex can go 700X50
The Scott Addict Gravel goes 700X45 (no UDH)
The one I keep coming back to is the 3T Italia Extrema with its 700X57 and UDH. The downside there for me is all the integration. I like how Pivot lets the user route their hoses/cable outside of the headset with the Vault, and the Stigmata is VERY user serviceable.
I've got time as I won't make any changes until maybe late Spring next year....who knows, maybe Open will come up with the perfect bike, they have sure been teasing stuff.
@Tyler Loewens - Or just get a Cutthroat. It's where all these other bikes are going to end up at anyway. ;>) Why wait for them to evolve?
The Brompton G is for the coming sport of Para-Bike-Packing.
You parachute into the wilds with your Brommie and ride out.
@scottg- I like this idea. One rule: No GPS and only a compass. :>)
The Cutthroat's MTB hub spacing leaves a bit to be desired. For some dumb reason, I still want the bike to feel sporty. Honestly, the Kona Ouroboros is a top contender for me, depending on what comes out between now and late Spring. I would love it if they made that a frameset.
I too noticed State’s error in describing the effect the change in offset would have. It’s surprising and a bit alarming to me that people so deep in the bicycle industry would misunderstand such a basic element of bicycle handling.
@Tyler Loewens - See, with these super-wide, (for a road drivetrain) tires that you are desiring, it is going to come to a point where gravel bikes are going to be Boost spaced sooner or later. Now, obviously, we all could be wrong about where gravel bikes are going in terms of tires/drive train, etc, but at some point you have to concede to physical limitations and gravel bikes with short chain stays and big tires are already pushing the limits of road bike gear and wheel spacing.
If the Pro riders really get behind MTB tires for gravel this will happen very quickly. That will essentially mean that brands will feel pressured by the OEM's of drive train components (Shimano/SRAM) to jump to Boost gravel spaced frames.
Or - Nothing of the sort ever happens because Shimano, and to some extent SRAM, are holding the cards in this gambit for wider tires in the gravel scene. If they don't make allowances for frame designers to get big tires and road cranks together then it ain't gonna happen. Not at scale.
@MG - Yeah, I was shaking my head when I read the press release and had to read it twice to make sure I was seeing it correctly. Maybe a person in marketing with little knowledge of bicycle design and theory wrote that up. But someone should have caught that before it went out.
Same for me. Though the increased offset/lower trail setting can help keep the handling agile with a front load, as you may have when bikepacking.
I have been riding low trail bikes for 9 years and it is a different ride, but one I like.
Post a Comment