![]() |
| Singular Pterodactyl (Image courtesy of Singular Cycles) |
To that end I've been looking at some currently available 32" wheeled bicycles. My focus has been on the Singular Pterodactyl, the Salsa Cycles Fargo, and the Twin Six 3x2 bike.
Of course, there are other 32" wheeled options out there, most of which are custom and very expensive. Leaving prices aside, availability is not great, and if I decide to go custom you always run the risk of being let down, which I've experienced first hand with custom bikes. So, I think I'd rather not go that route, both from my experiences and from the price standpoint.
![]() |
| Salsa Cycles Fargo 32"ers. (Image courtesy of Salsa Cycles) |
Things like the seat tube length. Maybe I am not accounting for how seat tube length has to be different for a 32"er. I am not sure about that. However; any seat tube shorter than 53cm is going to have a boatload of exposed seat post for my preferred fit. Two of these choices fall well short of 53cm, so this kind of concerns me. Again, maybe I just don't understand the geometry on 32 inch wheels, but it seems to me that I would definitely not be happy with a short seat tube and a ton of exposed seat post. Been there, done that on an early 29"er. The Pterodactyl I'd fit best on (Size Large) has a 55cm seat tube. That's great.
Secondly, bottom bracket drop is all over the place. I like what Salsa Cycles has done on the Fargo, dropping the bottom bracket below the axles at 106mm, while the other two bikes seem to have quite a bit less drop than this. I don't like high bottom brackets on 700 c bikes, so this concerns me as well.
The head angle on the Twin Six 3x2 is 69.5°, but the Fargo's is even slacker at 67° and the Pterodactyl seems steep at 71°. Of course, fork offset can be altered to get handling dialed in and the Fargo has 51mm, which seems like not quite enough for that slack a head angle and 32" wheels. Then the T-6 has a flip chip, so you can set their fork at 52mm or 59mm. Seems like a better deal with the unknown of 32" wheels. The Pterodactyl offset is 50mm, which seems like not enough to avoid toe overlap with a steeper head angle, but the trail is already stated to be at 88mm, so....
| Twin Six 3x2 (Image courtesy of Twin Six) |
And finally, the fit is odd for myself. I either have "okay" stand over and maybe a tiny bit too short a front center, or barely any stand over and good to almost too much front center distance. Stack height on any of these is ridiculously tall, so this explains all the negative rise stems you are seeing on 32"ers.
Soo.... What with the expense, the unknowns, having to downsize my fleet, and parts acquisitions, (wheels?!!) this idea seems like a really tough pill to swallow right now. I guess where I am at is that I really don't want a bike that has several compromises just to experience 32" wheels. Not for what it would cost, or from my perspective of being where I am at in life.
N.Y. Roll is getting the Twin Six 3x2. I may get to spin that around the block, if he is kind enough to allow me to try it out. But the others would be totally on faith and by the numbers. And right now, I'd say,"No sir, I do not like it."
And it isn't as if I don't have bicycles. Right? I'd be fine with the Fargo Gen I, or the Singular Cycles Gryphon Mk3, which is a fantastic, versatile bike. I have the Black Mountain Cycles MCD, a very fine rig, and the Singular Peregrine Mk4, which is also a capable bike.
No shade on anyone who has a 32"er or is jonesing for one. I get it. I just don't think the cake is fully baked yet, and I want to see some refinement in geometry and sizing before I'd be willing to jump in. And again, I may never jump in. But if something like this ever came around, I might change my mind.











