Randomonium

 NOTE: Okay folks, if you haven't been around long enough here to know what a "Randomonium" post is, then here is the deal. I ramble, rant, and randomly moan about all things cycling in one, in-cohesive, bizarre post. "Randomonium", okay?

Current state of the Peregrine Mk4

 Aluminum Wheels - Not A Downgrade:

I recently slapped on a set of wheels on the Peregrine Mk4 which had been languishing in the G-Ted Productions lab for ........years? Yes. Years. Why were they not used and why did I decide to use them now? This is a bit of an interesting story, in my opinion. 

First of all, I like aluminum rims. I have no qualms about using them in my personal wheel builds. So, this isn't having to do with any dislike of aluminum for a rim material. But I find it a bit uninteresting if I see or review a set of pre-built aluminum wheels.  

Why the negativity? I really do not know other than to say I am spoiled with lightweight, carbon rimmed wheel sets. Spoiled! I see aluminum pre-built wheels as being "cheaper" in terms of performance and weight. Obviously they are less expensive, but that is not why I have this proclivity to look upon aluminum wheel sets with some disdain.  

But I looked at my wheel inventory and saw a couple wheel sets which, honestly, are not too shabby, and they have aluminum rims. One is a set of Irwin wheels in aluminum. The other, and the set I used on the Peregrine, is an Easton EA-70 AX, (I think) wheel set. Both are fairly light, spin well, have great hubs, and.....well, I was being a snob I guess. I need to use these wheels up. 

And so I will. 

Prototype Manitou 32"er from earlier this year.

What Have We Learned?

The MADE Show coverage on Bikepacking.com has been extensive and thorough. If you have not either watched the YouTube videos or read the site, you should. I'll admit, I have not watched/read everything there yet. So, I maybe have missed a few things. But from what I've seen I gathered a few thoughts to share. 

Obviously, the custom frame builders see 32'ers as an opportunity to gin up some interest in each builder who chose to show one of these wagon-wheelers. Several were showcased and each has their own take on the way this format should be done. 

This indicates to me that we have not quite yet arrived at a consensus regarding standards in axle spacing, geometry, or sizing. 

It's also obvious that major component makers are taking this 32" thing seriously. I saw a Fox fork prototype and a Manitou one as well. These things do not exist without some hope of cashing in on a sweet OE contract from an established cycling brand. We know Trek is toying with 32"ers and are rumored to be bringing one to market soon. I have to assume Cannondale, Specialized, and Giant, amongst others are playing with this wheel size now as well. 

From a text sent to me by N.Y. Roll.

Don't Call It An Event:

Got a rare Saturday off coming up. It is happening due to an odd circumstance in which a gay pride festival takes over downtown Waterloo and renders doing business nigh unto impossible. 

The higher-ups decided it was not worth my being there, so I get a flyer on Saturday. I'm going on an adventure ride instead.  N.Y. Roll says we are doing "our own thing", but it will loosely be based off a ride called the "Dig Inn Dirt Incident".

I have vague information regarding N.Y. Roll's plans, but I do know it will be fun. The area we are riding in has plenty of rolling hills and plenty of dirt roads. (UPDATE: N.Y. Roll has a specific route shared with me now. Might mean something.....might not!) 

The planned distance is 60+ miles. Metric century, maybe more. Again, I am in the hands of N.Y. Roll, so.....anything is possible!  Now I just need to figure out what bicycle to ride. 

I'm leaning toward the pink BMC MCD. It has a Redshift Sports ShockStop stem on it and I have a set of wheels for it with 50mm wide Resolute tires which have some knobby tread. Tread which may help on dirt roads or places where the road is barely there, which I have a sneaking suspicion we will find ourselves on. 

Hopefully it doesn't rain and cancel our plans. Stay tuned.... 

October 3rd, 2020. A lunch with N.Y. Roll.

Those Weird Times:

Speaking of N.Y. Roll, while doing research on the blog for this post I came across a mention of a lunch I enjoyed with N.Y. Roll in 2020. 

I shake my head now, but those days were uncertain, scary, and stressful. Maybe we do not talk about this time period because we want to forget it. 

I am happy I documented these days on the blog as much as I did. It is easy to forget details after six years. My post back then I am referring to now mentioned the feelings of those days of Fall 2020:

 "You'll remember that at mid-March we were being told that this virus was going to pretty much end the world."

End the world as we knew it, is what I meant, and in many ways, it did just that. But we don't talk about this anymore, and I have to wonder, what about the scars left? What about the unhealed wounds we have from those days? Things which haven't been dealt with. They are still down there......somewhere. 

But it is the way with us in these times. We have stress, we argue about it for several days, and a month later we've moved on to some other deal. I don't know about you, but without a bicycle to ride, and my faith, I would be in worse shape than I maybe am in now. Much worse.  

Friday News And Views

 White Industries Introduces Limited Desert Sage Color On Components:

On Tuesday of this week, White Industries released news concerning a limited run of Desert Sage components. This hue is a Cerakote finish, not an anodization, and a finish which White Industries claims is resistant to scratches, stains, and heavy usage. 

Available on select White Industries components for a limited time only. Once the stock is gone, this color will not be offered again.  

For details see White Industries website.  

Comments: An interesting choice for a limited run. I tried wrapping my head around this color, but I am torn as to what I'd do with a head set, crank set, or hubs in a color which, for me, is akin to dried cow droppings. Maybe if I had a dark matte red frame, or an egg plant colored frame. I guess maybe it would work on my pink BMC, or an orange frame. 

Anyway, it is a curious hue to offer, and a weird enough color that - on the right build - could be outstanding.  

Image courtesy of English Cycles

MADE Show This Weekend:

The handmade bicycle show is an idea which has always drawn plenty of attention. It used to be the North American Handmade Bicycle Show, but that show faded away. Now days the show which essentially is the same thing as the old NAHBS is called MADE and is held in Portland, Oregon every year. 

Thanks to the wonderful immediacy of the innergoogles, one doesn't have to attend the show, or wait very long for imagery to pop up concerning the show. NAHBS moved around the country and provided regional access to seeing these creations with your own eyes, but these days I guess this doesn't matter. 

Anyway, guess what everyone is saying the "big deal" will be for this year? You guessed it, I bet. Thirty-Two inch wheeled bicycles. 

I wouldn't be surprised if those bikes garner a lot of attention, but I'll bet other wheel sizes will be shown with equally as cool frames and forks. What the "trends" will be is anyone's guess. 

Notable: A recent Facebook post by NAHBS founder, Don Walker, indicates that 2027 will see the return of NAHBS as the NAHBS Reunion & Invitationsl. The date is set for August 6-8, 2027 at the Palmer Events Center in Austin, Texas. Stay tuned for more details in the future.  

Image courtesy of Mosaic Cycles

Mosaic Offers Production Spec 32"er:

Mosaic Cycles, a custom and boutique brand based in Boulder, Colrado, announced on Tuesday of this week that it now offers a "Batch Built" 32 inch wheeled drop bar bike. 

Dubbed the GT-1 i55 32", this model will be built from double-butted titanium and features completely internal routing. A 1X only design, this bike will clear 32" x 55mm tires. 

Using a T-47 bottom bracket and Mosaic's own 32" specific carbon fork, this model was conceived from the ground-up as a 32" wheeled bike. The wheel spec is 110F 148R, which seems to be the direction 32" bikes will take for the time being in terms of axle spacing.  

For more details see Mosaic's page for this bike HERE.  

Comments: I imagine this is not a moderately priced bicycle, but besides this, it seems to be the direction many custom builders are taking with what is being shaped as 32" wheeled "monster-gravel". The lack of narrower tires in this category kind of forces this trend, in my opinion. Not that anyone is upset about it, but one has to wonder if there were a few choices in 32" x 45mm tires if axle standards and geometry would be a bit different than what we are seeing.  

Image courtesy of Industry Nine

As Long As We Are Talking 32"ers....

Industry Nine took the covers off a new offering they have dubbed "Hush 32 Carbon". Obviously the "carbon" bit is the rims. Otherwise this is a classic I-9 wheel set with their patented alloy spokes and alloy hubs available in several anodized colors. 

The wheels are available now and run $2,199.00. USD. 

Comments: What is weird about this wheel set, to my way of thinking, is the low spoke count. Twenty-four spokes seems like a bit on the edge for lateral wheel stiffness in a 32" hoop. 

Industry Nine makes a nice riding wheel though. I've tested several sets and I own a really old set of I-9's. The alloy spokes may seem weird but they work. So, I'd have a fair amount of confidence in these it's just that the 24 spoke count gives me pause. 

Interesting to see these debut now. I would not be at all surprised to see these wheels featured on something at the MADE Show this weekend.  

Keepin' The Wheel Theme Rollin'....

This week also saw the release ofthe 700c based  BERD Sparrow carbon wheels. These wheels use the fiber spokes by BERD and are laced to your choice of hubs listed on the Sparrow webpage. 

Using BERD's own Talon hubs, a ring drive/ratchet  style hub, the BERD spokes, and the new 50mm deep/30mm wide/25mm internal width carbon rims, you can realize a very light overall wheel weight. With tape and tubeless valves installed BERD claims the Sparrow wheel set weighs 1,068 grams. 

These wheels are pretty reasonably priced at $2.195.00 USD. 

Apparently BERD is also offering this model in a 32" size.  

Comments: N.Y. Roll actually saw a set of these being raced this past weekend at CORE4. The wheels also have been claimed to be good for rider comfort, and last weekend's event probably put that claim to the test. 

I can vouch for the way BERD spokes reduce vibrations, though. I have a set of wheels from 2020 which have I-9 hubs, BERD spokes, and Atomik carbon rims. There is something to the vibration reduction claims. 

Image courtesy of SILCA

 SILCA Offers Gravel Tire Range:

 SILCA announced on Thursday it now has tires for sale. A range dubbed "Protocol" contains one road tire model and three gravel tires. 

These tires all use premium materials, some in new ways, to provide claims of low weight, puncture resistance, and low rolling resistance. 

Offered in black wall only with 45mm, 50mm, and 55mm widths in a range which is defined by a numerical rating. The Protocol RG-1, (shown here) is the all-out race tire with minimalist tread. There is no RG-2 (curiously), so the next one in the range is RG-3 which is meant for all around-conditions gravel. The RG-4 is a deeper tread pattern meant for wet/mud or rougher terrains. 

There is even a 32" offering in the RG-3 HERE.  

All Protocol tires are selling now on SILCA's site and cost $99.00 each.  

You can see the entire range on this page.  Check out the very informative explainer video HERE. 

Comments: That explainer video is well worth your time. I guarantee you will learn something about tires from it. Josh, (SILCA head honcho) says they use a carbon fiber bead, and says they are making this tire the way they do "..because no one else is doing it." While this seems to be his messaging, I disagree with it. Maxxis has used a carbon fiber bead in some of its road and gravel tires for several years. So, this seems to be a bit of marketing-speak from SILCA on this point. 

But the other data and evidence Josh speaks about in the video seems compelling. Well.....maybe not a hundred bucks a tire compelling, but I am not racing, so I am not the core audience for these tires. Racing is expensive, and these tires prove it. 

I do like the "pseudo-radial" technology and the carbon fiber bead makes a ton of sense. Maybe some more moderately priced tires will eventually pick up on some of this new tech and become available in the near future. 

Winner, Winner....

No, your eyes do not deceive you. That is N.Y. Roll on the podium at CORE4 which occurred just this past weekend. 

Despite the rains all last week, despite the course changes, and despite the chance the event conditions would be poor, N.Y. Roll showed up and finished the course. Because he did all of that, and was the only one in his category to do so, he won. 

This kind of goes back to what I used to say about all the gravel riders in the earlier days of gravel riding. They showed up? They won. If they tried and couldn't finish? They won. If they finished, but were at the front, middle, or the back? They won. 

Anyway.... Check out N.Y. Roll's conversation with me concerning his day and a whole bunch of other stuff HERE on the latest episode of The Guitar Ted Podcast. 

And that wraps up another week here at Guitar Ted Productions! Thanks for reading. Now get out there and ride your bicycle!

Friday News And Views

Teravail Cannonball 32"ers Available:

Image courtesy of Teravail

The 32" wheel introductions have most often been focused on MTB product. However; gravel usage has been teased by several manufacturers and now we have a true gravel component in 32" diameter. The first "gravel" tire for 32'ers is the Teravail Cannonball. 

The Cannonball design was intentionally focused on gravel usage, so while this tire in a 2.2" width may strike some as still being XC MTB focused, it is by design intentions a gravel tire. 

The 32" Cannonball features Teravail's Superstructure Casing which is made up of extra-fine, hardened Nylon fibers to help reduce punctures but retain a supple riding casing. The rubber compound is Teravail's Fast Plus which is claimed to be Teravail's fastest rolling rubber compound in their range. 

You can check out either the tan wall or black wall version of the 32" Cannonball by clicking HERE. 

From Wilde Bicycle Co. social media.

32"er News From Wilde Bicycle Co. 

Seen on social media this week: A Wilde Bicycle Co. post teasing a new, as yet unreleased 32"er MTB XC bike. The post indicated this is a test mule for possible future production. 

There were no concrete dates or timelines given as Wilde wants to wait on a suitable suspension fork to test the frame with. 

Comments: Again, 32"ers are being jumped on by smaller, more agile companies which don't have to wait on production lines to be geared up for large runs. 

Although, I have heard through the grapevine that current factory production is not anywhere near maximum levels, and this may also play into how smaller companies have been able to push smaller production runs through for 32"ers. 

However this plays out, my theory is that there is a small amount of 32"er curious, bike nerdy folks who are possible sales targets for 32" wheels and once those folks have their bikes? I think any sort of larger, general cycling population being interested in 32"ers won't be as eager to bite on the unknown. Big brands who aren't going to have 32"ers out until late this year or early in 2027 may find the 32"er market has satisfied their appetite for this wheel size by buying from the smaller companies who were able to pivot to 32"ers more quickly. 

And I could be completely off my rocker. We will see.......
 

Image courtesy of SILCA

SILCA Announces Super-Secret v2 Lubricant:

SILCA Super-Secret lubricant has always fared quite well in my "Guitar Ted Lube-Off" tests and it is my current go-to lubricant for my gravel bikes. It does exceptionally well in dry gravel conditions. However; it wasn't all that great in the wet and so I never really trusted it for Spring, Winter, or if things got wet at any time of the year. 

SILCA has now upped its game with Super-Secret v2 lubricant. The claim is that it is faster, longer lasting, and holds up even in wet conditions. So, I bought some and it will be here shortly. Look for more "Guitar Ted Lube-Off" content soon!

And speaking of the Lube-Off, I last updated the testing HERE.  That was later into last year. I haven't been lax in testing since then, I just haven't updated anything here yet. This will certainly change, obviously, with the new Super-Secret v2 coming here soon. 

 I also have another lube which just arrived and is not yet on the open market. I will be testing it as well. So, this new Lube-Off should be interesting and pitted against the old contenders. Those include Super-Secret v1, the Effetto Mariposa Flowerpower wax lube, and Stan's Dry Lubricant. This Lube-Off should prove to reveal the best lubricant ever for gravel riding. 

I know.....big claim. But I think it will be true, and I am excited to try out these two new lubricants over the end of Summer and into Fall. Stay tuned..... 

New Dura Ace C-50 (mage courtesy of Shimano)

 Do New Dura Ace Wheels Point To What Could Come For Gravel?

On Wednesday Shimano released the poorly held secret that they have new Dura Ace carbon wheels available now. 

These are a range of rim depths and a rear disc wheel for road, triathlon, and perhaps cyclo cross usage. They don't have current "fashionable" inner rim widths for gravel. 

However; what we do see are carbon fiber spokes. The total wheel weight for the 50mm deep Dura Ace wheels (shown) is 1,302 grams for the pair. Curent Shimano RX-880 wheels have a 25mm (vs 23mm for Dura Ace) inner rim width and a 32mm depth vs the 50mm depth of the new Dura Ace. The total weight of the RX-880's is just shy of 1,400 grams at 1,397 grams. This is with stainless steel spokes. 

Obviously trends have changed and Shimano, never one to jump on changes right away, may not be pushing the cutting edges of wheel tech with a new RX series wheel yet. But it is hard to discount what Chinese wheel companies are doing now and for the prices they are doing it at, which are pretty incredibly low. 

Should Shimano come out with an even wider inner rim width gravel wheel set with carbon spokes with a total wheel weight of under 1,400 grams, it would be a huge development. Let's say the newer wheel had a 30mm inner rim width, and carbon spokes. Maybe a 40mm rim depth. It would be very competitive, as long as you bought a bike with those wheels already on it. Dura Ace wheels are well over 2K for the pair, and this is not at all competitive with Chinese gravel wheel sets, many selling for well under 1K for a pair.  

With Shimano you do get a company with service, widespread availability of repair parts, and most bike shops understand and can work on Shimano components. Chinese wheel sets? Hmm..... Not so much. But if you are willing to take a chance..... 

Image courtesy of DT Swiss

DT Swiss Revamps 1800 Wheel Range

Usually we talk about the bougie, expensive wheels here on the FN&V, but not everyone wants, needs, or can afford those carbon fiber wonder-wheels. So, what's a regular Joe or Jill supposed to look for?

How about a reliable, durable, and practical wheel set? This describes DT Swiss' 1800 range of wheels to a "T". 

There are three newly refreshed wheels in the 1800 Spline range now with the Aero (A), Endurance (E), and the Gravel (G) 1800 models. In those three divisions there are some options as well, most notably the option to get a front wheel with a DT Swiss branded Shutter Precision dynamo hub. 

Most of the range goes for a little north of $600.00 USD, so these won't break the bank and you can get solid DT Swiss reliability from the 370 hubs to the spokes and the new rims featuring a 26mm inner width. There are separate rims from this range available also for those looking to build some wheels. 

See the range HERE.  

Image courtesy of Ritchey Design

Ritchey Updates Streem Handlebar:

It seems that the old odball tag which used to be used for flared drop bars is no longer valid. No more "alt-bar" descriptions for these drop bars in 2026. 

Especially since a traditional road drop bar like the Streem now has 10° of flare. This road riding bar now has what Ritchey said in their press release is a design which is "...in line with how riders approach road riding today." And this - "....the compact shape, gentle backsweep, and increasing-radius bends give riders a natural interface for their hands when the road goes long or the pace gets honest. So, backsweep and flare. Hmm..... Gravel has made a dent, it would seem. 

The new Streem is available in aluminum construction in the WCS and Comp ranges with the difference being the WCS has triple-butted tubing. Check out the new bars, which have been priced lower than the outgoing models, and all of Ritchey's handlebar options HERE. 
 

Thanks so much for reading Guitar Ted Productions. Now get out there and ride those bicycles! Summer is fading fast! 

Friday News And Views

Twin Six 3X2 32"er frame set (Image courtesy of Twin Six)

 Order Up! 32"er Companies Pushing Big Wheels:

You may have noted some promotions over the past week, week and a half, by several small purveyors of 32"ers. The orders are going in and minimums must be met to get production started. 

Esker, Twin Six, Curve Cycling, and others were pushing social media posts hard recently in hopes of getting riders to bite on this enticing, (for taller folks, mostly) technology.  

I know someone who has an order in, and I'm sure many of you out there are either in line to get one, or are considering it. One thing to note here: 32 inch wheels will probably not have the "gen I issues" 29"ers had. So, biting on the 32'er bait shouldn't get you an obsolete rig in five years. 

Hopefully..... 

 I'm very curious about 32"ers. But I do not need another bicycle. Plus, I'm willing to wait to see how things shake out. If this is all that and a bag of chips, I can get one whenever I want in the near future. And this means that if things change in regard to geometry, etc with 32"ers, I will not have bought into something that will be obsolete. 

Maybe....

Seeing on social media that Trek will have hard tail and FS 32"ers out in February 2027. (Heard they were taking orders now.) Specialized, Pivot, and Ari Cycles are rumored to be doing 32"ers as well. So, perhaps it won't be obsolete right away.  

Probably..... 

Guitar Ted Approved:

Well folks, I found a silver seat post and a saddle and now the Singular Cycles Peregrine Mk4 is all finished (for the near future - I make no guarantees!)

The seat post is an old Campagnolo aero post. If you are familiar with those, you know they are not very long! I was able to get the correct seat height and still have the minimum insertion mark inside the seat tube, but only just! 

The saddle is a tried and true WTB Silverado, which has been my 'go-to' saddle of late. The two pieces cap of the build and now everything is ready to go for a longer gravel ride. 

The final 'approved by Guitar Ted' action was to sticker the frame up with a Trans Iowa sticker and a 'Jacob' sticker in honor of my late son. So I'm pleased with the switcheroo and all systems are go for gravel travel now. 

Image courtesy of Giant Bicycles

Giant Announces Revolt Advance SL Model With Carbon Hub/Spoke Wheel System

On Tuesday of this week online sites were going ga-ga over Giant's newest gravel bikes. The Revolt Advance SL is the range topper with racing focused geometry and parts. 

And how about those wheels? Carbon hubs and spokes with a wheel weight under 1,300 grams total for front and rear wheels.  

Comments: Fun stuff for the bike nerds to geek out over, but dive into the marketing, specs, and geometry and really let it sink in. This is a bike for the less than 1% of gravel riders. It is a Pro level racing bike and much of the "feature list" descriptions could have been pulled directly from marketing of Tour de France bikes from the 2000's. "Stiffer", "feedback from racers". and  aero everything, of course. 

Is this a bike for The Every-person? No. It is not. But that is who will end up buying this bike because "weight", "aero", and "Pro racing" sells bikes to.....I guess some folks? Anyway, congratulations on race-ifying gravel bikes, Giant.  

And is it just me, or does this bike resemble every Chinese brand gravel bike I've seen recently? Hmm.... 

Date Set For GT's Ride For Jacob:

Thanks to Nick from the Board of the Cedar Valley Bicycle Collective, I have secured a date for GT's Ride For Jacob. We will be riding from the North parking lot at Big Woods Lake starting at 8:00am on Saturday, July 25th. 

The ride will consist of a loop from the parking lot at Big Woods Lake to gravel North of Waterloo, Iowa. We will pass through Janesville, Iowa, cross the Cedar River, then we will go on to cross the Shell Rock River and travel through Shell Rock, Iowa. From this most Northern point of the loop we will head West and South towards New Hartford, our last pass-through town. 

The ride will end by coming into Cedar Falls from the West toward downtown on mostly bike path. There could be a stop downtown if folks are so inclined. The ride from downtown to the parking lot at Big Woods Lake is a short one all on bicycle path.  

Stay tuned for any further updates here or on the ride site.  

Image courtesy of WTB

WTB Teases New Unreleased Hub, Hints At New Wheels To Come:

A press release from WTB on Wednesday pointed out a new hub WTB has designed which is being used by the Cannondale Factory Race Team and won with at a recent Elite XCO World Cup event.

Looking through the release I was able to glean out that the rear hub will use a "DLC ratchet ring-drive system". It may be similar to DT Swiss' ratcheting drive design. This is a fairly commonplace move since the patent ran out on the design formerly held by DT Swiss. 

Dubbed "Frequency 7X" hubs, the set for MTB usage is a claimed sub 300 grams for the pair. These hubs spin on "oversized Enduro bearings" and are claimed to be tough enough for World Cup MTB while being amazingly light. 

The press release hinted that these, as yet unreleased hubs, will appear with new carbon rims for MTB and gravel use. So, look for some news on the wheel front from WTB in the near future. Another tidbit I gleaned from a thread on social media is that WTB is also working on an aero gravel tire design. Could it be that the new rims, hubs, and tire will be presented as a racing wheel system for gravel which is very aero? 

Could be a thing. 

That's a wrap on this week! If you are a US citizen, enjoy a safe and enjoyable 4th of July weekend! Get out there and ride some bicycles! 

Thoughts On The 32"er Fargo

Note: The images shared in this article were provided as part of the Teravail tire and rim release.  Commentary is Guitar Ted's.

Titanium Fargo 32'er. Image courtesy of Teravail

 This announcement by Salsa Cycles is perhaps one of the worst kept secrets in the cycling industry, that I am aware of, for quite some time. Rumors and sightings of the 32"er Fargo prototypes have been circulating around the internet for months. 

Now that the bike is out in the open, what can we infer from its release? Technical specs will  be everywhere on the internet, undoubtedly, and will be debated. What I am interested in is what impact this may have regarding 29"ers and 32"ers going forward. 

Image courtesy of Teravail

With the tires this bike is being sold with, and with the option of using a Teravail Camrock or Cannonball, it seems as though QBP/Salsa/Teravail are all in on 32"ers, at least for the short term. 

Salsa Cycles, as reported in a recent "Bicycle Retailer and Industry News" report, is one of the top five brands at the retail level in the USA.With a steel Fargo 32"er and a titanium one, it would be apparent that Salsa is betting on robust sales of 32" wheeled Fargos, at least in the short term. Salsa certainly has the presence at the retail level to support larger numbers of bikes in 32" wheels. 

That same "BRAIN" article showed a big drop off for retail presence for many other brands. Of course, Trek is number one with Specialized right behind. Cannondale ranks up there as well as Giant. These are brands which typically are more conservative with newer ideas in niche areas of cycling. However; I would expect something from one or more of the Big Four brands sooner than later if Salsa sees brisk sales of Fargos with giant wheels. 

Image courtesy of Teravail

The Fargo was the original "Adventure by Bike" product and certainly this new Fargo will be aimed at taller folk for bike packing and gravel uses. The mountain bike DNA the Fargo has always had will make this a decent mild single track bike. I think 32" wheels and the Fargo is a good fit. But what about other bikes? 

Well, we will see. It all depends upon how the marketplace sees 32"ers. Will they be pigeonholed into XC MTB? Will the big wheels find a home in the bikepacking crowd? What about drop bar bikes for gravel? I think all of this will be offered up front, but what catches on is anyone's guess. 

In the end, you still won't be putting many medium sized people on these bikes and smaller folk won't even have the option. (Although Salsa is offering a small in the Fargo, surprisingly) In this scenario I see 29"ers still being the dominant wheel size. Then the question becomes "Will the industry support two different wheel sizes? If history is any indication, the answer has to be "No". For example, the 27.5"er wheels are still around, but they are being shed from the gravel side faster than a speeding bullet and are becoming rarer in MTB all the time. Same situation with the once ballyhooed "Plus-sized" wheels. 

My gut tells me the industry will not suffer two major wheel sizes for long. I could be wrong. But history says I'm probably right.  

UPDATE: Check out this VIDEO from Bikepacking.com where Neil Beltechenko reviews the new Titanium Fargo.  

In the video it is revealed that the Fargo 32 will only be frame/fork/through axles/head set/seat collar at first with the steel bike coming in the Fall of 2026. Standard Boost spacing , which is a bit of a surprise, and a size small!  Whisky Mtn carbon fork, (for now). Prices: $3,499.00 titanium and $1,799.00 steel. 

Press Release: Teravail Introduces 32"er Tires and Rim.

 Note: All information and images were supplied by Teravail to Guitar Ted Productions. Comments in Comment section are Guitar Ted's.

Teravail announces 32" tires and rims today. The buzz around this new tire size caused quite a stir last year and now the choices are expanding. Teravail will now offer the following tire models in 32" size. 

Camrock 32" X 2.4" (Available as of Today)

Cannonball 32" X 2.2" (Coming June 2026)

Plus, Teravail will be offering its 32" version of the Circos Wide carbon fiber rim. (Available this Summer)

Features: 

Both 32" models will feature Teravail's "Superstructure" casing which has extra-strong, fine Nylon fibers which provide a stronger baseline tire. The rubber compound on both tire models will be the new "Fast Pus", Teravail's fastest rolling rubber compound yet. Both tires will come in black or tan sidewalls. 

The Circos Wide rim will have front and rear optimized spoke hole patterns and will be front and rear specific with the rear rim having a 28mm internal width and the front a 29mm internal rim width. 

The Circos is designed to support high-volume gravel tires from 50mm - 60mm in width. Circos will be available in 28 hole or 32 hole options. The Circos weighs 400 grams for the front and 420 grams for the rear. 

Teravail 32" Cannonball in skin wall and black wall. 

Circos also has hookless sidewalls and the spoke bed is reinforced and optimized for spoke washers. Complete wheels with DT Swiss 350 hubs are also available. (Complete wheel sets weigh approximately 1,700 grams for the set.)The Circos rims have a Lifetime Warranty. 

Comments: Obviously this goes along with the Fargo 32"er as QBP owns both brands. It is interesting to note in the feature list how Teravail states the Circos is designed for "high volume gravel tires". Perhaps other brand's high volume gravel tires? Which means there would be more 32" gravel bikes as well. 

 QBP is pretty ubiquitous across the USA, so anyone with a hankering for 32" rubber and rims should find getting a set easy to do. 

Aero Gravel Wheels: A Case For And Against

 As most of the cycling nerdom knows, aerodynamics play a big part in getting speed and efficiencies optimized for speedy riding. Yes, not everyone needs or wants aero, but if you want to make riding gravel a bit easier, aerodynamics is a good place to start. 

Aero can mean position on the bike, clothing, or in the design of the frame of your bicycle. But perhaps no upgrade in aero can make more of a difference than wheels.  Both in aero and in rotational weight, with even a nod to comfort. I think body position can get you the best gains, but as far as multi-benefits go, the wheels give you more. 

I've been trying out aero-focused wheel sets on gravel since 2012, well ahead of most folks, and so I have experienced what the wheels with aero design can do for your ride. Now with racing driving the development of gravel, aero wheels are becoming even more of a forefront thought in rider's considerations for upgrades. 

It hasn't been this way until very recently, as far as gravel riders go. As I found out in 2020, when I tested FLO aero gravel wheels, many were dismissive of the deeper section wheels and their aero benefits. This despite evidence from triathlon and road racing which clearly showed how much aero wheels can benefit a rider. Any rider, not just racing athletes.  

The Case For Aero Wheels: Besides cutting through the air more efficiently, which is what most aero wheel documents will focus on, there are a few other things which should be thought about. One is rider fatigue. Depending upon the design, a rider can benefit from less effort in crosswinds, and working less to keep momentum and stability intact is going to result in a fresher rider over a certain distance.  

But other factors, like design in the rim itself, can also contribute to comfort levels. The FLO Cycling wheels I tested actually had a flex component which absorbed vibrations, an obvious benefit on crushed rock roads. Many wheels are now also going to wider inner rim profiles, which match wider tires gravel riders are using better. This not only enhances the aerodynamic properties of the wheel/tire combination, but it also allows the rider to use lower air pressures to obtain an even smoother ride. 

NOBL Wheels Far 50. Image courtesy of NOBL Wheels.

 Weights of aero wheels have been getting better, but also consider that a lighter/lightest wheel often is not the best wheel overall. Perhaps in a specialist category of hill climbing, the lightest wheel set wins. But older and more recent wheel testing has shown lighter wheels can suffer from being harder to hold momentum over smaller deflections and obviously, over larger inputs like gravel. 

A heavier wheel, to an extent, can actually be faster with the rider expending less energy due to the momentum effect of the wheel. If the wheel is not being deflected, but carrying energy over an input from the surface, you need to do less work. Kind of like a crankshaft counterweight, or a flywheel. 

Obviously, too much weight isn't good either, but going deeper and a bit heavier with rim weight shouldn't be looked at as a negative in many aero wheel cases.  

The Case Against Aero Wheels: Not everyone will benefit from aero wheel sets. If you ride what essentially would be described as single track with a gravel bike, the benefits of aero could be lowered to almost having no effect. Especially if you ride a lot of trail with heavy deceleration zones requiring a lot of acceleration back to speed. Weight, and where the weight is on a wheel, may become an issue there. And again, perhaps with a more hill climbing course, aero may not be of much benefit on those types of courses. 

The Singular Albatross. (Image courtesy of Singular Cycles)

However; the big unknown here, and which may be a big factor in what you want to do with aero wheels in the near future, is the 32" wheel. 

This wheel may take over as a major option for gravel riders. I've heard from several sources that the 32"er will become a thing in gravel racing/riding. So, this is not speculation. 

What is still up in the air are things like hub width standards, and ultimately what width tires will be best for gravel on a 32" wheel. Theoretically, since the tire contact patch is longer than what a 700c gravel tire has, one might be able to get away with a slightly narrower 32" gravel tire. This might allow for the same/similar rider comfort and control benefits with a similar weight to a wider 700c tire on a gravel bike. Also, this would help with frontal aero concerns. 

With those questions all hanging out there, does a gravel rider bank on sticking with 700c and risk not getting the potential benefits of a 32"er, or does the rider bet on 32'ers and then find out it was all just a flash in the pan? 

I think if it weren't for the tantalizing possibilities of 32" wheels, just getting a 700c aero gravel wheel set is a slam-dunk. Maybe it still is. I would guess so if you are dead set against 32"ers, or are well under 6ft tall. 

Conclusions: Obviously, many riders are invested into standards surrounding 700c and are not in a position, or willing, or both, to switch over to something new - and as yet - unproven. So for those riders, getting an aero wheel set makes a lot of sense. I really see no negatives which would compel me to not want an aero 700c gravel wheel set. Especially since companies are now starting to develop wider internal width choices in aero rims. 

I know the old and tired argument which states that if you are going under "x miles an hour" you do not need aerodynamic wheels. I say phooey! In my mind, if you are moving aerodynamics matter. Maybe to a lesser extent at 12mph than at 25mph, but it matters, and this is enough for me to consider aero wheel sets for gravel riding. 

The 32" Watch: Yakking About Big Hoops

Yep..... Another Guitar Ted Podcast just dropped. You'd think we both had nothing else better to do. (Correct) So, anyway, maybe you'd like to check out our ramblings on these monster sized hoops. Click Here

So, as far as this whole new wheel size becoming a thing or not, here is a nugget of wisdom I gleaned from my time covering the cycling industry. It is a "sure thing" something is going to be marketed heavily if this one thing occurs. 

The one thing? Original Equipment Manufacturer orders. Often abbreviated to "OEM" or even "OE", this means some factory is receiving an order from a company/brand to make something in mass quantities. 

In other words, to give you a clearer picture, Fox is not coming out with a 32" suspension fork unless some company/brand orders thousands of them. Same goes for tires, or rims/wheels. Anything specific to a standard ordered by a company/brand, in this case, 32" wheels, is a tip-off as to what is going to happen. 

We know Maxxis is coming out with several 32" tire models. We have a strong indication via insiders that a Fox suspension fork is coming out. Manitou will have a 32"er suspension fork by mid-2027. I posted about Schwalbe's tire plans last week. It isn't a question anymore. 32" tires/wheels will become available to purchase world-wide in the very near future. 

Expect a ton of marketing to show up this Spring showing the benefits of these wheels. Expect a ton of push-back on site comment sections and on social media. I suspect we all will be pretty tired of the hype by mid-Summer. 

Rich Dillen's Vassago 32"er (Image courtesy of Rich Dillen)

 If I had to say, my opinion is bikes with 32" wheels will become available in shops and online by the Fall. More options will hit from then onward until Spring 2027. Some second tier brands will be certain to have them in their line up. Maybe......maybe one of the big four - Trek, Specialized, Cannondale,or Giant will also, but my bet is they all are going to come later, if they come at all. I'm not saying one of these four mainstream brands will not make a 32"er, but it is certainly possible one or more of them will make a 32"er, or several versions of them. I just think they will be amongst the latter offerings. 

And you will see gravel, recreational, and eBike versions with giant hoops on them. More than just MTB's will be 32"ers. Anyway..... There is a lot more detail to this. Listen to the episode. Let me know what you think in the comments.    

Real World Feedback: 

Of course, it's all blue sky until the reality of what a 32"er actually can or cannot do is discovered by riders. I was fortunate enough to have had Rich Dillen message me after his recent ride in a local short track event. 

Image courtesy of R.Dillen by Pisgah Paparazzi

Rich has a blog where you can check out his takes on the 32" wheels, but suffice it to say that after about 45 minutes of him messaging me he pretty much convinced me of this wheel size and its benefits. 

I won't belabor the points he made here, (again - See his blog for more), but suffice it to say that even if half of what he said is true 32"ers will be the preferred single track bike in the Midwest. 

 I know many will scoff, and many won't give 32"ers a chance. Look......I get it. I went through all of the skepticism surrounding 29"ers too. They said 29"ers were dumb, a fad, and worse things about those who rode them. 26"ers weren't going anywhere. But look around your local bike shop or peruse your favorite online MTB purveyors. How many new 26" wheeled MTB's do you find for sale in 2026?

I'm not saying 29"ers will be supplanted by 32"ers, but the 32"er is not going away anytime soon either. Naysayers will come and go, but once people get onboard a 32"er and find out what it can and cannot do, then the results will determine the outcome of this wheel size. And again, based upon this real-world feedback, things seem to be looking good for the 32"er. 

Nuff said..... 

Some Things I Am Thinking About

I put short-ish cranks on last year.

 It's Winter. Not much of a chance for longer country rides. With the lack of snow, fat biking went out the window as well. So, I've been left with sitting around more than I'd care to and thinking. 

Dangerous activity, I know, but here are a few things I've been thinking about recently which I may or may not delve into further in 2026.  

No particular order here, just a few things I thought I'd share. 

Shorter Cranks: I've been intrigued by this idea over the past year or so. I put on a set of 170mm cranks on my Raleigh Tamland Two last year to try something out which I had not done before. 170mm may not seem "short", I understand, but this is where I was willing to start. If it was somewhat worse than 172.5mm, (my preferred gravel length up until this point), then it couldn't be that much worse. However, say I went with 165mm cranks and did not like them. Well.......

I guess so far I seem to feel a difference in a positive way running 170mm cranks. So, I could see trying 165mm cranks on a gravel bike. Thing is, I am not into 12 and 13 speed drive trains, and well..... Maybe I could set up something in 11 speed, I just have not looked that hard yet. Something I'm still thinking about.... 

Singular Albatross 32"er prototype. Image courtesy of Singular Cycles.

32'er Bikes: So, I've been interested in this entire development on the 32"er platform. Not so much from a mountain biking perspective, but from a gravel riding one.

Of course, no one else seems to be onboard with this idea, so all the prototyping and testing has been centered around off-road type equipment.  

32" seems a no-brainer from a gravel riding perspective to me though. Momentum of those bigger wheels has to be a factor in being able to carry more speed over the rollers here. Additionally the longer tire contact patch will be something which will make vibrations less, and make the bike more stable on fast, loose gravel descents. 

I know MG is getting one of these bikes to try out, and he will probably try it on gravel. I cannot wait to hear his take on this. Until then, I will be dreaming of a drop bar set up for gravel and 32"ers. 

Maybe someday....

Clik Valve

Clik Valve vs BBB CoreCap: Inflation in terms of cycling is a good thing. You know.....for your tires? I know people are keen on this subject bcause of the number of hits I got covering Clik Valve last year. 

I really like the system. It is SUPER easy to use, and otherwise is no issue at all. Yes - You have to have a proper Clik Valve pump head to enjoy all the benefits of Clik Valve. So, in this way, it is a big commitment. 

A competing valve standard has arisen promising big airflow, less clogged valves, and ease of use. It is from BBB and is called CoreCap. 

CoreCap utilizes the Schrader compatibility you already have and is a system which simply replaces a removable Presta valve core. Simple. Could be a winner. 

I can see the benefits from a tubeless user's standpoint. I do not see it as being "easier" to use, because Clik Valve is so stupidly easy to use it would take a miracle to beat it out in terms of ease of usage. However; the standard does require a change which many people will balk at. (Note: You can inflate a Clik Valve equipped tire with a standard pump. You just lose the ease of use.) 

You can read more about the BBB CoreCap on my blogging compatriot's site HERE. Muddy Moles will be testing these out soon, so keep abreast of his updates, or just visit his blog. I have it linked in the right sidebar on this page. 

That's about it from my brain dump today! More thinkering (if the Winter drags on) to come.  

The Thirty-Two Watch: What Happens Now With 750D?

 Okay, I know you are never supposed to ask a question in a headline, but this is the subject of the post, so...bear with me. The alternative big wheel sizes are going to face a lot of scrutiny in the coming months, but one which is little known is seemingly on the brink of being passed by for 32"ers. 

Of course, I am speaking of the 750D, a size WTB created to be an alternative wheel for 29"er hard tail riders and for gravel/adventure riders seeking better roll-over benefits. I was made aware of this effort by WTB several years ago, and was promised a set of wheels to try out, maybe even a complete bike, but it never materialized. 

750D on the left in a Stormchaser frame. Warbird on the right with 700c wheels. 

 I was provided the image above by a friend. The 750D wheel and tire is WTB's take on the idea. The tire is a 40mm wide Nanoraptor. On the right is a traditional gravel wheel set up. So you can see the overall wheel diameter difference is notable. 

WTB was betting on this size to be something a 29"er rider could swap into their hard tail and have a gravel riding set up with a similar diameter to a 29" x 2.4" tire.  Thus making the overall feel similar, and keeping geometry intact on the bike. But like so many ideas which seem to vaporize before their time, or are misunderstood, 750D was passed off as "too weird", "a made-up standard", and just not different enough to be bothered with. 

Image courtesy of WTB . 700c on right.

More importantly, no brands seemed interested. Niche brand Dirty Sixer seemed to be the big pusher of 32" early on and got some interest drummed up enough to get V Rubber to make them some tires. These were bigger, wider tires than the tires WTB was showing with 750D.

Had WTB dared to show, say a two-inch wider Nanoraptor instead of the 40mm width on a 750D rim, well maybe things would be rolling in a different direction. (Pun intended)

Of course, it is all water under the bridge now as 32" wheels are set to be unleashed upon the XC MTB marketplace. I've seen mentions about this for gravel since my last post on the wheel size as well. 

Some Things To Consider:

Before you become one of the already thousands of punters who are going off with speculations regarding how and why 32"ers are dumb - or worse - you may want to consider a few things. 

First and foremost, the benefits of a larger diameter wheel are scientific fact. So, we can forget about 32 not being "better". It inherently is better by way of physics. Now there are a few other things to think about here as well. 

• Materials Technology: When 29"ers came about, there were a LOT of obstacles to overcome. Tires were the least of the issues, but there weren't any big, trail worthy tires for years until closer to 2010. Tire mold-machines were said to be the reason why. There weren't any big enough to make fatter, wider 29"er rubber. This will not be an issue with 32"ers. 
• Rims: 29"ers suffered early on from poorly designed rims, (Rim brakes at first! Egad!) and rims were narrow and heavy. This will not be the case with 32"ers. Already sub-1300 gram wheel sets exist in 32" size. Keep in mind also that 700c was arbitrary due to convenience and tradition. Yes, there was some older science to back up this size wheel, but people changed in the 100 years since this work had been done, so... 
• Geometry: When 29"ers came about all anyone knew were 26", "NORBA" style XC trail bikes. Even downhill racing bikes of the day had ridiculously steep head tube angles and high bottom brackets. 29"ers forced a rethinking of everything from fork offsets to seat tube angles and more. The bikes we have now are, in part, due to 29"ers shaking up of traditional thoughts on geometry. 32 inch wheels will benefit from this previous experience and avoid the pitfalls early 29"ers fell into with regard to geometry.  

So, one more thing to chew on from a gravel rider's viewpoint. I think 32 inch wheels have a fair chance at becoming a gravel rider's next bike IF the bikes and wheels do two things: Absorb vibrations, NOT trail obstacles. Secondly, they must be an advantage on rolling, open terrain.  These wheels should be stable in cross winds and eat up rolling hills or they won't be worth the effort to buy. 

As far as advantages on trails off-road? I don't care. None of the "big deals" for off road riding will be things I would switch to 32" for. I do not need better roll-over. I'm riding crushed rock roads, (gravel, ya know?), and roll-over is not going to be anything notable going from 700c X 45mm - 50mm up to 32"ers. Weight is a BIG deal to me. So a larger, longer frame and bigger tires, which will weigh more, is not really an advantage to me. 32"ers will have a LOT harder time breaking into the gravel scene than they will the MTB arena. 

Maybe if we "half-stepped" it up with a750D X 45mm wheel and tire it would make more sense. I don't know, but I think 750D is dead in the water now.  

If "gravel" is defined by you as "trails/light single track, or off road primarily", then 32"ers may be a thing for your riding. But here in Iowa? Yeah.... It's going to be a lot harder to justify those bigger wheels. 

I'd still give 'em a try though!

Friday News And Views

Image courtesy of Onza Tires

 Onza Tires Brings Full Range Of Gravel Tires To Market:

Onza Tires, better known for mountain bike fare, has just announced a new range of gravel tires called "Alegra X". In an effort to guide riders to a "best tire" choice, these tires are arrayed in a ranking to categorize them from least grippy, best rolling resistance to most grippy, higher rolling resistance. With "1" having the fastest tread all the way to "6", with the most off-road ready" tread, Onza expects riders will better be able to dial in an Alegra X model which best suits their needs. 

All models seem to have 120TPI casings, single compound rubber, and a choice of tan or black wall sidewalls. Most are $59.99 USD. Sizes range from 40mm to 50mm, but not all models are available in all sizes or sidewall styles. 

See Onza's website for more details HERE.  

Comments: The ranking system is similar to how Vittoria Tires is doing things now within their range of gravel tires. Onza is not a big name in the States, so it remains to be seen how this range will be accepted. However; in my opinion this looks like a more budget friendly, high-value, low in features range. Tread designs are right in the current fashion trends for gravel, and you might be reminded of several better known brands and models while perusing the Onza range. 

Everything in the Alegra X range looks "safe" as far as how it will work on gravel, and I suspect these will all be okay for most people. However; I don't see much in the way of innovative design or anything overly inspiring here. Most of these tread designs are derivative, and look to be based off designs known to work just fine. Maybe Onza makes a dent here, but there are a LOT of choices in gravel tires in 2025/26, so the competition for space on rider's wheels is intense. 

Image courtesy of Madrone Cycles

Madrone Cycles Offers "Jab" Rebuildable Rear Mech:

Last year I featured the Madrone Cycles rear mech prototype in an FN&V segment. Now the rear derailleur for 1X systems from Shimano or SRAM is available to purchase. 

With a configurable, rebuildable design, the Jab rear mech promises versatility, longevity, and customization based upon the choice of different anodized colors. The Jab has received decent reviews so far, so the product looks promising. 

Prices will range depending upon configuration, but a standard gravel Jab runs about $298.00 USD. A Jab configured with a purple body and for Shimano 11 speed gravel usage, (shown) would run $327.00 USD. 

You can learn more on the page for the Jab HERE. 

Comments: Rebuildable? Okay......when was the last time you thought, "Hey! Why can't I rebuild my rear mech?" Maybe you've destroyed one in a wreck, or in poor conditions. Okay, maybe then. However, most rear derailleurs I have replaced over the past 30 years of repair work were 50% - 100% destroyed. You'd likely have to purchase a new rear mech anyway, unless Madrone sells all the individual parts for the Jab aftermarket. Sure, they sell most of the parts now, but what if you tweak the linkage parallelogram bits?

Then there is the price of admission. Again, as I stated in 2024, you can buy a brand new Shimano GRX rear mech for quite a bit less money. SRAM as well. Obviously, the Madrone offering looks completely cool and rad, but is it worth that much more? This is really what the piece boils down to. The way you answer this question will determine the part's value to you. There is no "wrong" answer here for a consumer, assuming it does its job. It's just that I'm not seeing what question this piece answers from a technical standpoint.  

Courtesy of Salsa Cycles social media

Salsa Reveals Another New Drop Bar Model:

The Mega Mid-South happened last weekend and both the men's and women's events were won on a new Salsa Cycles model which has not been released yet. 

The bike was feted in a Salsa Cycles social media post this week and the name of the model was revealed. The new model is going to be known as the "Flyway". 

This bike will, according to Salsa Cycles, be released this coming February. Details are said to become known about the Flyway in January, most likely because this is when dealers will be informed of those details.  

You may recall another teased new model from Salsa Cycles earlier in the Fall. I reported on this in an FN&V HERE. You may note that bike being a full suspension model with drop bars. This is not the same as the Flyway, which obviously is a hard tail, rigid front fork bike in the image shown here. 

Comments: Salsa Cycles has not redesigned, or tweaked the Warbird gravel racing bike for several years. It is long overdue for a refresh. Could the Flyway be a Warbird replacement? My guess is it will be replacing the Warbird, as Salsa's parent company has been sanitizing model names for several years. The Warbird refresh is a perfect time to axe the "militaristic" nomenclature and christen the refresh with a new, unoffensive name. Besides this, Salsa posted on their Facebook page that this bike is their "..... fifth generation gravel racing bike." Note: This is purely speculation on my part, but we've already seen a few re-namings in Salsa's line, so this would track if it is true.  

We can deduce from the images the  Flyway has a suspension corrected fork, larger tire clearances, and accessory fork mounts. The sloping top tube can be seen in this escape collective post, (paywalled if you want to read the entire post), which indicates dropper post compatibility. I'd also assume there is in-frame storage, full-internal routing, and possibly no support for mechanical group-sets, as is the fashion these days.  

We'll be keeping our eyes open for more on this "new" model after the turn of the New Year.  

The 32 Inch Wheel Watch:

More and more it seems apparent the 32 inch MTB wheel is going to be a thing in 2026. Rumors are being passed around saying more choices in tires are on the way, and more people are starting to move in a direction which points to small production runs of frames and forks for the wheel size. 

While I have ridden a 36"er, I haven't ridden one off-road, so I cannot say what a 32"er would be like. Furthermore, I'm not really interested in spending a bunch of money on an off-road bike I'd barely ever use. 

If I were to get into this wheel size, it would be for gravel, and for my sort of riding, a 32"er wheel makes a ton of sense. So, I am interested in what becomes of this sort of idea, and if it ever became possible, and the tires were there which made sense, I'd probably get one of these newer, bigger wagon wheelers for my stable. 

I think the rolling momentum of such a wheel would be primo for the rolling hills of Iowa. The vibration reducing possibilities are tantalizing for a man of my age who is not getting any younger. A drop bar, single speed 32"er makes a lot of sense to me, and if I would have to use 2"-plus wide tires, I'm good with it as long as the geometry is correct. 

So, while I do not need another gravel bike, I might need  a 32"er, especially if it was something which would extend my years as a gravel cyclist. 

 

Gore To Cease Marketing Cycling Wear:

In a surprise announcement via Gorewear's parent company, WL Gore & Associates GmbH, it has been learned the Gore cycling business will cease operations and remaining inventory will be sold out with no further replacements. 

Citing economic hardships in the business, Gore stated in a letter to retailers obtained by a German bicycle industry publication that they saw no good future prospects for success for the brand. You can read more about the closing of Gorewear in this Bike Radar article HERE. 

Comments: Gore was very aggressive in terms of marketing throughout the last 15 years. They were not shy about sending kit to several outlets, including some I have been associated with in the past. However; it never seemed as though Gore could gain a foothold against the Raphas, MAAP's, and other trendy companies. 

Gore did find itself with a hit when they developed the Shake Dry rain jacket, (shown) which had immediate effect in the marketplace, being heralded as a major technology breakthrough in wet weather cycling gear. However; it had to pull the technology off the market due to PFAS concerns and Gore's own commitments to environmentally friendly products. This was something that was a blow to the company as they never really had any answer to the Shake Dry jacket. 

This news comes on the heels of YT Bikes closure in North America, and with a slew of deep-discount sales for "Pre-Black Friday" within the industry. All of this is not very encouraging heading into Winter. 
 

That's a wrap on this week! Thank you for reading Guitar Ted Productions! Now get out and ride a bicycle!