Someone in the comments said earlier this week the following statement: "Too much Peregrine content?? No way. It’s your New Bike Day/Month! We want all the details! "
Well, be very careful what you ask for, because here is more content about the Peregrine.
I'm in my "getting to know you" phase of ownership here which includes my making small tweaks to my set up. I can only do this fine tuning after rides lasting from 30 minutes to an hour or so. I ride. I make a tweak. I ride and see if what I did results in what I am after. Rinse and repeat until I finally am satisfied.
So, to describe why I was 'tweaking' what I was tweaking I have to go back to the original intentions for the build. One of those was to use what I had on the Twin Six as much as possible. This meant avoiding new cables and housings, new brake hoses, and all the things this can entail. In this I was successful. However; because of this I had painted myself in something of a corner which I had to find a way out from behind.
This mostly had to do with how I was sat on the bike. I was a tiny bit cramped due to the need for the stubby Whisky Parts Co. stem I used. I could not put a longer stem on the bike because I'd have to switch out the rear brake hose, rear cable housing, and rear cable. So, to gain a little bit of the lost reach back, I decided to try to find and use a seat post with a little more setback and a saddle which would also accommodate me in this way as well. I was hoping both things would get me closer to the number I like to see for my reach.
![]() |
The Honeman Flyer with the Thomson seat post, zero offset. |
Looking at my fleet of bicycles I noted I had not addressed the seat post issue on the Honeman Flyer 100% to my liking. (The bike with the seemingly never-ending seat post saga!) Anyway..... I had been using a Salsa Cycles Ti Regulator post on this bike which has a fair amount of set back. This was not ideal for the Honeman Flyer's 70° seat tube angle. I started off with a zero offset post on the Flyer and it was better, from an ergonomic standpoint. It was undersized though, and slipped all the time, so it had to go. I eventually landed on the Ti Regulator as a stop-gap solution to end all the slipping seat post madness I was experiencing with this bike.
Well, if I could find a suitable post for the Honeman Flyer maybe I could poach the seat post for the Peregrine. So, to the seat post bin! (Yes......I have multiple unused seat posts sitting in a big tin can!) I rummaged through this assortment of seat posts and came across a nice silver Thomson post with zero offset. Nice! Now I could swap posts with the Honeman Flyer and maybe get the setback I was looking for.
![]() |
The Peregrine Mk4 with the Salsa Ti Regulator and WTB Solano saddle installed. |
![]() |
I'd say that looks like a good half of an inch there. |
The image here shows the closest I could get to touching the tire with my toes. I'd say this is not very close! Also, I try to set my cleats back as far as I can, but not all the way back. Very close to it, but I would still have room for my foot even if my cleats were slammed all the way back.
So, the good news here is that a size Large should not cause any issues with toe overlap. Maybe if I were running fenders, I might have toe overlap with this big of a tire, but I bet I'd still be good, if just barely so.
Had I been sporting the biggest tire which would clear the Peregrine's frame and fork, I probably would get a bit of toe contact, in my opinion, but I'm not planning on going to the extreme which would cause this to happen.
Next, I had someone in the comments ask about contrasting the ride of the Peregrine with my Gen I Fargo. So, this is really an apples and oranges thing, in my opinion. The Fargo Gen I being a more MTB-leaning drop bar bike, while the Peregrine is based on a classical road bike. Certainly the two overlap in certain aspects, but as far as the ride quality, these are very different bicycles.
I think it might prove to be enlightening if I just put it this way: I'm not getting rid of either of the two bikes and they will do different things for me. Now if one was doing the same thing for me as the other? One would have to go away, as I wouldn't ride one of them. As it stands, again for myself, this is not the case and both bikes will remain in my service for the time being.
If anything, this Peregrine is probably more like my Black Mountain Cycles MCD. But I will have to do some back-to-back comparisons to verify this. Keeping in mind the MCD can run 'up to' a 50mm tire, while the Peregrine can handle even slightly larger tires.
Okay, I think I've covered just about everything I wanted to get to on this update. I hope you folks who had indicated you were fine with more Peregrine content are satisfied! Ha!
I'll have more to share here soon. I know of one more tweak which is coming, and there may be more. Plus I hope for ride content as well. Stay tuned.
8 comments:
I know this is about the new bike, but that Honeman is SO good looking.
I agree with you 100 percent!!
!teamdarb, !Tyler Loewens. Thanks! It is one of, if not the most, fun bicycle I have to ride. It turned out becoming one of my favorite bicycles out of the gate. I'm still very surprised by this, given the radical nature of the geometry.
You've definitely got me thinking about this bike a little too much. Now I'm thinking about buying a frameset. But the stack/reach is kinda throwing me off. I have a Kona Unit X, size medium. And I'm surprised that the size large MK4 has shorter reach and similar stack! Do you think the MK4 actually has a pretty "normal" stack/reach for this type of bike?
@eBikeADV - Okay, I am going to assume you what you mean by "this type of bike" means a classically inspired, drop bar design. (Or....?) This is what the Peregrine is.
The Kona Unit X is not even the same type of bicycle. The geometry and design intent is RADICALLY different than the Peregrine's is. So, how would one propose to compare some fit numbers? It just doesn't seem to be a good idea.
So, "for this type of bike"? (Peregrine) Yes, it is "normal", just like the numbers for the Kona Unit X (or THAT type of bike) is "normal" for it.
The whole way one is sat on a Peregrine is just not even the same as a Unit X. So, this is a difficult question.
Just to reiterate GT's comment, the Peregrine is indeed expected to be built with a more traditional road/touring/rando type setup with a drop handlebar and a longish stem. Something like the Unit will have far longer reach in a given size as it's designed for a use with a flat handlebar and short stem. If you'd like some more guidance on fit please just drop me an email. Cheers, Sam.
Love seeing how this is evolving GT! One thing I would say is - don't compromise on fit for the sake of a couple of cables!
@sam@singularcycles - hey Sam! Thank you for the kind words. As for the fit, I have it pretty dialed in to what I like, so no worries there.
I just got a silver anodized Cowchipper bar installed so now I finally have the bike where I think it will be for some time now. All I have to do is ride it! Look for more updates soon.
And as always, THANK YOU!
Cheers!
GT
Post a Comment