Two Things

Wait.....what's this now?

 Peregrine Part Deux:

Last year I picked up a Singular Peregrine Mk4 frame and fork. I based my selection of a size Large on the data shown on Singular's site. However; once I had it built up and I had ridden it some, I was caught second guessing that decision. 

The bike seemed a bit compact in length to me, but again, the sizing charts were correct and matched the frame. It wasn't a total disaster, by any stretch, but I knew it was going to require a lot of fiddling around to dial it in better. At the time, (last Fall 2025), I wasn't motivated to tackle that just yet. I was, and still am, dealing with a lot in my life elsewhere. 

However; early this Spring I had mentioned while texting with Matt Gersib that I wasn't 100% settled into that bike yet and I mentioned what I had in mind to tweak it. Matt had another idea. 

One thing led to another and well, an exchange was arranged with Singular Cycles for a size XL Peregrine Mk4. The terms were very generous on the part of Singular and I was happy to pursue this possibility. Now the frame and fork are here and just before I leave for a big trip! 

So..... I'll have to put this off until my return from BRAN. That will be tough to do, but I have a lot of details to pull together before I leave and tinkering with swapping parts off one frame to another will have to wait. Meanwhile, at least I won't have any questions about what I will be doing once I return. Look for a full report when I get back and started in on this project.  

Once again, image courtesy of Mike Riemer

A Little Follow-up On That 32" Fargo At Unbound:

While the Scott 32"ers grabbed most of the oxygen in the post Unbound room, those weren't the only successful rides put in on 32" wheels. I mentioned it in my thoughts on the recent happenings at Unbound here, but there were some thoughts shared in the comments on that article I thought deserved more eyeballs. 

First though, let's give Joe Meiser, the rider of the Fargo 32"er, some props. Those were some horrendous conditions, and Joe came through quite well, by all accounts. Additionally he hasn't been actively racing much of late, so his come-back, if we can call it that, is even more remarkable. 200 miles in the Flint Hills is no joke on a decent weather year. This was anything but a decent weather year, so hats off to Joe! 

Now, Mike Riemer, image taker of Joe finishing the 200 here, jumped in the comments and had the following to say:

"Joe’s Fargo 32 stayed incredibly free of mud. At each support stop we sprayed 2 or 3 bottles of water onto his drivetrain and brake calipers. At those stops I pulled a small amount of mud from the top of his bb (bottom bracket) shell. That was the only place it collected. Joe finished in 12:43 and was incredibly steady throughout. He averaged 16.26 mph, which is what he’d planned on doing. Checkpoint 3 was the only time we saw him feeling the affects of the day, as he began using one word answers and one word requests. Pretty great performance IMO and all based on a training plan of just 10 hours riding per week."

So, do 32" wheels shed mud better than smaller wheels? Reports on the Scott bikes also made mention of this. Although I think it is fair to say that some witnesses to the event, and some riders, were saying this mud was wetter and less sticky than some years of this races past where the mud was like Velcro. I can say this may be true, as I witnessed and rode through very sticky mud in 2015 where the event saw no rain on race day, but had been rained on for days prior to the event. Overcast and foggy conditions that year ensured there would be no drying out of the roads from Sun or wind. 

It is an interesting observation, all the more so after seeing many 700c bikes from this year's event packed up with sticky mud. Something to think about if you are considering a 32"er.