That is the world as we know it now, and for off roaders, it is now a 10 speed world. If you were waiting on that high end, Shimano or SRAM made 11-36T cassette, well, that ship has sailed, my friend. Not gonna happen. 9 speed off road stuff will be supported in the aftermarket, for awhile, but don't expect any innovations. Do expect less choices until that fateful day when "poof"! It's no longer available. Just ask six and seven speed stuff.
Now, moving forward, we have this to deal with and as most things go, it isn't all that bad. However; there are some things that I see as glaring mistakes. In no particular order, here is what I have noted...
- Gearing: Add a cog and take away the lowest possible gear? seems counter-intuitive to a lot of riders. That said, I still think 22 X 36 is ridiculously low, and really unusable for my riding. It does work for some, seemingly, and it would have been easy to just leave that 22T alone in the DynaSys system. SRAM seems to have it, so I guess you can always go that way, except for that....
- Two By Ten Set Up: Here we have the component giants miss stepping again with their offerings for gear combinations. Hopefully these "gaps" get filled in later, but in the meantime, there isn't an XX triple, and there should be. Minor gripe, but there it is.
- Grip Shift Is No More: While most riders will probably never miss it, others that swear by Grip Shift were left out in the cold by the switch to 10 speed. Will SRAM ever offer it in 10's? Maybe, but until then, the small, garage guys are filling that niche.
- Price Of Ownership: As with 10 speed road stuff, 10 speed mountain bike stuff at the higher end is ridiculously expensive. SRAM is particularly conspicuous here with their XX level cassette. I just checked on-line and prices still are well over $200.00 for a steel cassette. (Yes- it is made from a single block of steel, but still...) Even an XTR cassette with titanium, aluminum, and steel construction was less money, (somewhere either side of $200.00), when it was the pinnacle of the mountain bike world. The SRAM offering for X-0 was even less than that. Chains? Not as bad as you might think, but still significantly higher priced for 10 speed.
Other than some ergonomic complaints, I really have been impressed by the DynaSys group's wear and the performance is at least as good as 9spd, but not improved upon it. In the case of SRAM, the XX group is nothing short of amazing in terms of front shifting especially. The rest of the performance there is also at a crisper, more refined level than X-0, as it should be.
In the end, it isn't as bad as I thought it would be, but it isn't as necessary as they, (the component giants) would have you think. We could have made a better 9spd, and lived going forward with no real issues. However; I don't think 10 speed is the end of the line either. In a prophetic statement, or early leak, (you choose which), KMC, a chain manufacturer who happens to make most of Shimano's chains, handed out literature recently on their "X11SL" chains. It states that it is a chain compatible with "Shimano, Campagnolo, and SRAM 11 speed drive train system".
So, enjoy the 10 speed while you can!
9 comments:
I'm hearing that SRAM will be offering 3x10 soon. They are sticking with 2x10 but have acknowledged that there is support out there for 3x10 systems. I have no idea at what level - X.7, X.9 or XX.
@Wally: According to my research, SRAM is going to offer, (or already is offering), 3 X 10 in everything from X-7 to X-0, just not in its premier XX yet. Maybe what you heard was in reference to XX?
I tell ya, I really love parts of my 2x10 on the Salsa Spearfish. However, the 26t granny is way too small for me. Just riding along if I dump from the big ring to granny, I have to downshift a bunch of times to "catch up" with the gearing. I personally would like to have a 30t. Really, I think a 1x11 would suit me quite well. Have a bash guard with a 38t big ring.
I'm one of those guys that swears by grip shift, so I'm a little bummed by the news. Guess I'll have to check out those small garage guys or stock up on 9 speed components.
I guess I'm going to be the one standing up for 22 x 36 low gears. My bike is a Specialized Carbon Experr 29 with a 2 x 9 setup. I use low gear a lot; with big wheel traction you can climb long and steep technical hills feet-up. Once in a while I would like one notch lower!
Dumbest thing ever with this combo is the alloy freehub body Specialized spec'ed.
My relatively new Trek/Gary Fisher X-Caliber shipped in late 2010 with SRAM X.7 in 3x10. The cassette is 24-36 and my clydesdale self has not broken the 10sp chain, even though I tend to stay in the middle ring most of the time, and mash up hills. I really think a 1x10 would suit me 95% of the time on my local trails here in GA.
I'm hoarding 7 and 8 speed stuff, myself. For the non-racer, I don't see enough advantage to even 9-speed, much less 10-speed, mountain bike equipment to justify the huge price tag.
Yes, for most people, the price tag is not only outrageous, but pretty much unaffordable. And, it's just another example of the major players in the industry blindly following race development at the expense of the average rider.
In my opinion, anyway. YMMV.
for one I would like to see double xt crank i'm sorry $800 is a lot of money for crank 350-400 is about right.
The gripshift thing is ridiculous. The "small garage guys" solving this problem aren't exactly doing it for cheap either...
I'm 9 speed for another year on my Mamasita and just switched from 10 "down" to da 7700 on my cyclocross/gravel race bike. Nice to have interchangeability. Plus the cost of a couple of 11-32 XTR cassettes these days is pretty appealing vs. any of the 10 speed options that come in with similar quality.
Post a Comment